Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
psy400ch3p58-
consent document is required to include the following information,
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| consent document includes: Invitation, Evidence voluntary; kept confidential, private; participant tasks | Risks and benefits, Costs to participate, Alternatives to participation, signature panal |
| Deidentified data | any information that may be used to identify participants (e.g., name, address, phone number) has been removed. |
| Pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates (and children in general), prisoners, detainees individuals with illnesses or conditions are | considered vulnerable populations |
| Step 3: Submit Proposal for Review Common problems | Insufficient detail or information; Conflicting information in different parts of the application; Missing elements in the consent document; or Failure to use approved templates, language that were provided by the IRB |
| Expedited research | reviewed by the institutional review board through accelerated procedures |
| WAYS TO SPEED THE APPROVAL PROCESS | ask questions of staff as you prepare your application; positive relationship; define exempt or expedited research; minimal risk |
| Studies posing more than minimal risk require an outline of steps that | you will take to minimize risks and a clear explanation of how the benefits of the research outweigh the risks. |
| Although there are no direct benefits to individual participants, | knowledge gained from this research will greatly enhance our knowledge of ... |
| new to research (or new to an institution), ask a colleague | for a recent IRB protocol that has been approved |
| Most IRB committees review research projects annually to ensure that participants have been treated ethically, | to check that proper records have been kept, and to evaluate potential changes to risks |
| Research records must include accurate, up-to-date counts of the number of participants and a signed consent form for every | participant, unless the researcher has applied for a waiver of consent |
| keep track of the number of individuals who dropped out of the study and | their reasons for dropping out. |
| the American Psychological Association states that you should keep “study materials" for | at least five years post publication |
| Coercion | The act of taking away someone's voluntary choice to participate through either negative or positive means. |
| researchers typically build a “firewall " between themselves and potential | participants so that they do not know which students choose or refuse to participate |
| compensation should correspond to | what is being asked of participants |
| The Beck Depression Inventory is a widely validated brief survey | measure often used as a screen for depression in research. |
| students exposed to questions about suicide in a survey were | no more likely to report suicidal ideation than students who were not presented with the survey |
| The best approach when facing a potential research risk is to | have an effective plan in place to deal with the risk and to confer with your local IRB about best practices |
| Conflict of Interest: financial or other considerations may | compromise or appear to compromise a researcher's judgment in conducting or reporting research |
| the only "remedy" for a conflict of interest is full disclosure so that the community of scholars can | account for the conflict in vetting the research findings |
| Deception | moderate or mild, more moderate forms of deception must include a thorough debriefing at the conclusion of the study. |
| Active deception | The giving of false information to study participants. |
| Passive deception | the withholding of some study details from participants. |
| deception is only considered justifiable if the question being | answered is important enough to allow for the temporary breach of ethics |
| deception is viewed as justifiable only if a researcher can demonstrate that no other methods | are available to study the given topic. |
| Debrief:To give participants study information that was | initially withheld and the reasons that information was withheld. |
| Dehoax | To make participants fully aware of any deception to prevent potential harm |
| Mandated reporters | individuals who have a legal obligation to report incidents such as elder or child abuse to the authorities |
| Researchers are generally not | considered by law mandated reporters |
Created by:
james22222222