click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
psy400ch3p51
Negotiating the Institutional Review Board Process
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| TYPE OF IRB REVIEW | exempt, expedited, and greater than minimal risk |
| Exempt research includes: work evaluating educational practices in established educational settings as well as | survey, interview, or observational procedures where subjects are not identified or public behavior is being observed |
| IRBs will expedite research that presents | minimal risk to participants or involves a minor revision to an already approved protocol |
| Greater than minimal risk research | may pose substantial risk to participants and requires a full institutional review board review. |
| STEPS IN THE IRB PROCESS | ethics training, preparation of the proposal, and submission of the proposal to the IRB |
| Step 1: Complete Ethics Training | get online cirtificate |
| Step 2: Prepare Proposal | get to know IRB staff members and work with rather than against them |
| Abstract | A brief summary that outlines the specific aims of your research and why the research is important. |
| Qualitative research | The use of open-ended and exploratory methodology, which focuses on gathering in depth information on topics of interest. |
| Quantitative research | The use of numerical data and statistical techniques to examine questions of interest. |
| clearly explain the importance of proposed research, | since even exploratory/qualitative research is arguably grounded in a goal of examining specific research questions. |
| Protocol document: summarizes an intended research project, including | the specific aims, background and importance, participants, methods, and predicted results. |
| provide only a basic outline of the research project that | focuses on issues related to the protection of human subjects |
| giving a general description of the stimuli may help you | avoid having to send a revised IRB application every time you decide to alter the stimuli later |
| Identification of Participants | number, recruiting, inclusion and exclusion criteria, subject selection should be equitable, |
| subject selection should be equitable | socioeconomically and racially diverse participants and not rely on a single population (i.e.,upper-middle-class people,men) |
| recruitment should be noncoercive; participation should be | clearly voluntary, and the recruiting process should respect the autonomy of participants. |
| Often IRBs will request copies of | flyers, e-mails, and phone scripts that will be used to recruit participants. |
| it is usually better to overestimate the number of participants you will include in your research because IRBs do not like | it when you exceed the number tor which you have been approved |
| collecting more data than expected is considered | a violation of research protocol |
| inflate your subject number by | at least 50% |
| running additional participants may | increase the overall risk |
| Informed consent | Agreement of a participant to take part in a study, having been made aware of the potential risks. |