click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Classic Flaws
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Bad Conditional Reasoning | occurs when the author reads the conditionals supplied in the premises incorrectly |
| Bad Causal Reasoning | looking for bad causal reasoning is really just looking for causal reasoning |
| Whole-to-Part & Part-to-Whole | you can never assume from wholes to parts or from parts to wholes |
| Overgeneralization | takes something small & turns it into something big |
| Survey Problems | always assume surveys are done with the greatest possible incompetence |
| False Starts | researchers always assume that the two groups are same in all respects except the ones called out as part of the study (the two groups are always inconveniently different) |
| Possibility is NOT Certainty | comes down to a lack of comfort with ambiguity |
| Implication | opinions & facts do not play well together |
| False Dichotomy | pretends there are only two options when there really could be more |
| Straw Man | "respond" to an opponent by "mishearing" what was said to them |
| Ad Hominem | insult the proponent of a position, but then the conclusion challenges the truth of the position itself |
| Circular Reasoning | assumes the conclusion is true before doing the work of proving it so |
| Equivocation | happens when the author changes the meaning of a word throughout an argument |
| Appeal Fallacies | turning someone's opinion into fact |
| Irrelevant | occurs when the premises are entirely unrelated to the conclusion |
| Percentage is NOT Numbers | a rising percentage doesn't necessarily imply a rising number & vice versa |