click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
CHH 19
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| class expansion | A new member is added to a demonstrated stimulus equivalence class as the result of teaching a new conditional discrimination |
| class merger | Independent equivalence classes are combined as the result of teaching a new but interrelated conditional discrimination. |
| class-specific reinforcement | A match-to-sample procedure in which not only is the correct comparison choice conditional on the sample stimulus, but the type of consequence delivered is, too; class-specific consequences themselves become members of the equivalence classes. |
| conditional discrimination | Performance in a match-to-sample procedure in which discrimination between the comparison stimuli is conditional on, or depends on, the sample stimulus present on each trial. |
| contextual control | The situation or context in which a stimulus (or stimulus class) occurs determines its function. |
| derived stimulus relations | Responding indicating a relation (e.g., same as, opposite, different from, better than) between two or more stimuli that emerges as an indirect function of related instruction or experience. |
| emergent stimulus relations | Stimulus relations that are not taught directly but emerge as an indirect function of related instruction or experience. |
| equivalence-class formation | The emergence of accurate responding to untrained and nonreinforced stimulus–stimulus relations following the reinforcement of responses to some stimulus–stimulus relations. |
| equivalence test | A probe for the emergence of untrained stimulus–stimulus relations that evaluates both symmetry and transitivity simultaneously. |
| exclusion | A procedure for building new arbitrary conditional discriminations based on the robust finding that learners will select a novel comparison stimulus over a known one in the presence of a novel sample. |
| higher-order operant class | Behavior defined in terms of general relations between antecedents and responses, rather than in terms of specific stimuli and responses; examples include generalized imitation, manding, instruction following, naming, and relational framing. |
| matching-to-sample procedure | A discrete trial procedure for investigating conditional relations and stimulus equivalence. Responses that select a comparison stimulus that matches the sample stimulus are reinforced. |
| nodal stimulus (node) | A stimulus set that must be held in common across a minimum of two conditional discriminations to provide a basis for all equivalence properties. |
| reflexivity | A type of stimulus-to-stimulus relation in which the learner, without any prior training or reinforcement for doing so, selects a comparison stimulus that is the same as the sample stimulus |
| simple discrimination | Responding is under stimulus control of a single antecedent stimulus condition |
| simple-to-complex testing protocol | An arrangement in which types of stimulus equivalence probes are introduced sequentially, beginning with symmetry, followed by transitivity (if relevant), and then combined tests for equivalence. |
| stimulus-control topographies | Refers to two different forms of stimulus control that can result from a match-to-sample procedure involving one sample stimulus and two comparison stimuli |
| stimulus equivalence | The emergence of accurate responding to untrained and nonreinforced stimulus–stimulus relations following the reinforcement of responses to some stimulus–stimulus relations. (AKA equivalence-class formation) |
| symmetry | A type of stimulus-to-stimulus relationship in which the learner, without prior training or reinforcement for doing so, demonstrates the reversibility of matched sample and comparison stimuli |
| training structure | Refers to dimensions of procedural arrangements when teaching multiple conditional discriminations. |
| transfer of function | Occurs when teaching a new function for one member of an established equivalence class results in the same function holding for all members of the class. |
| transitivity | Describes derived stimulus–stimulus relations that emerge as a product of training two other stimulus–stimulus relations |