click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
philosophy
first half of philosphy for midterm 1
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Definition of Philosophy | Philosophy is a reflective inquiry into ideas and assumptions we often take for granted. |
| Philosophy's Purpose | It seeks to understand fundamental questions about existence and reality. |
| Love of Wisdom | The term 'philosophy' comes from Greek words meaning 'loving wisdom'. |
| Critical Examination | Critical examination of ideas is essential to wisdom, avoiding blind acceptance of traditions or authority. |
| Accessibility of Philosophy | Philosophy is open to everyone, regardless of age. |
| Philosophizing | Philosophizing stems from human wonder, distinguishing humans from other animals. |
| Exploration of Questions | Philosophical inquiry leads to further questions, enriching understanding even if definitive answers are not reached. |
| Metaphysics | Examines the nature of reality and existence. |
| Epistemology: | Investigates the nature and scope of knowledge. |
| Axiology: | Concerns judgments of value, including ethics and aesthetics. |
| Logic: | : Focuses on the rules for valid reasoning and argumentation. |
| Interconnectivity of Branches | Insights from one philosophical branch can inform others. |
| Awareness of Worldviews | The course will focus on Western Philosophy, but recognizing and respecting other worldviews is crucial. |
| Socrates | Historical Context: Lived from 469 B.C.E to 399 B.C.E in Athens; no writings attributed to him. |
| Socratic Method | Known for the Socratic Method, which involves a question-and-answer dialogue to stimulate critical thinking. |
| Socratic Method Step 1 | Question: The questioner poses a simple question. |
| Socratic Method Step 2 | Answer: The respondent answers. |
| Socratic Method Steps 3 | Challenge: The questioner shows how the answer is inadequate or leads to absurd consequences. |
| Socratic Method Steps 4 | Adjust: The respondent revises their answer. |
| Socratic Method Steps 5 | Repeat: Return to step 3. |
| Arguments | A group of statements with premises that support a conclusion. |
| Premise | Statement supporting the conclusion. |
| Conclusion | Final statement drawn from premises. |
| Validity | Conclusion must follow from premises. |
| Soundness | Premises must be true. |
| deductive | Premises guarantee the conclusion (general to specific). |
| inductive | Premises support the conclusion but do not guarantee it (specific to general). |
| Conditional Statements: | 'If A, then B' (does not assert truth of A or B). |
| Transitive Reasoning: | If A leads to B, and B leads to C, then A leads to C. |
| Straw Man: | Misrepresenting an argument to refute it easily. |
| Ad Hominem: | Attacking the person instead of addressing the argument. |
| Appeal to Popularity: | Assuming something is true because many believe it. |
| False Dilemma: | Presenting limited choices when more exist. |
| Slippery Slope: | |
| Impact of Religion | Religion shapes societal values and goals but can also lead to conflict when beliefs are dogmatically followed. |
| Importance of God in Philosophy | Critical examination of these beliefs fosters wisdom and better understanding. |
| Engaging with philosophical inquiries | Can deepen one's appreciation of God and align individuals with divine intentions. |
| Ontological Proof | Arguments based on the nature of God. |
| Cosmological Proof | Arguments based on the universe's existence. |
| Teleological Proof | Arguments based on perceived design in the universe. |
| Religious Experience Proof | Arguments based on personal experiences of the divine. |
| St. Anselm of Canterbury | A significant figure (1033-1109 C.E.) who attempted to prove God's existence through philosophical reasoning. |
| The Ontological Argument | Posits that God, defined as the greatest conceivable being, must exist in reality to avoid contradiction. |
| Existence and Greatness | Something that exists is greater than something that exists only in the mind. |
| Faith and Understanding | Anselm suggests that belief precedes understanding—one must believe to comprehend. |
| Definition of God | God is the greatest conceivable being. |
| Existence in the Mind | Even the fool who says God does not exist has an idea of God in their mind. |
| Existence in Reality Is Greater | If God exists only as an idea in the mind, then it is possible to conceive of a being greater than God. |
| Conclusion of Anselm's Argument | Therefore, God must exist in reality; otherwise, God would not be the greatest conceivable being. |
| Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument | Aquinas argues that Anselm's argument does not prove God's existence outside of being just a concept in someone's mind. |
| Ibn Sina's View | He believed God did not create the world in time but that creation is eternal, which raises questions against the Big Bang Theory. |
| Teleological Argument for the Existence of God | An argument that suggests the existence of a designer based on the purposeful design observed in the world. |
| Analogy of the Watch | William Paley uses the analogy of finding a watch vs. a stone to illustrate that a watch indicates purpose and design, unlike a stone. |
| Purposeful Design | A watch has parts arranged purposefully to function, suggesting a creator. |
| Functional Flaws | If a watch is flawed or imperfect, it still doesn't negate the fact that it was designed. |
| Fine-Tuned Universe | The precise conditions in the universe suggest deliberate design; however, the idea of a multiverse complicates this argument. |
| Critical Thinking | Be aware of potential logical fallacies in arguments supporting or opposing the teleological argument. |
| Problem of Evil | A challenge to the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God. |