click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
public speaking 2
Question | Answer |
---|---|
question of fact | a question about the truth or falsity of an assertion |
question of value | a question about the worth, rightness, morality, merit of an idea or action |
question of policy | a question about whether or not a specific course of action should be taken |
ethos | credibility- establish self as believable and authoritative- based upon the audience's perceptions |
competence | audience's perceptions of the speaker's intelligence, expertise, and knowledge of the subject |
character | audience's perception of the speaker's sincerity, trustworthiness, and concern for the well-being of the audience not stable |
establishing ethos | 1. explain competence 2. establish common ground 3. deliver speeches fluently, expressively, and with conviction |
pathos | emotional appeal- appeal to the feelings and values of the audience |
establishing pathos | 1. use emotional language 2. develop vivid examples 3. speak with sincerity and conviction |
logos | logic- evidence-> reasoning/warrant-> claim |
example/generalization | one represents all are there counter-examples? are examples fit group? are there enough examples? |
analogy | the known=the unknown are they truly similar in relevant ways? similar enough? any major differences? |
causal | this causes that is this a sufficient cause? did the cause happen because of the effect? |
sign | observed indicates unobserved is there a more plausible alternative explanation? is x an unusual case? can this sign be found without y occurring? |
deduction | going from general to specific; reasoning from principle do you accept the general principle? is the characteristic possessed by all members of the class? is the person or thing genuinely a member of that class? |
hasty generalization | draw conclusions based on too few or atypical examples |
false analogy | compare things that are not alike in significant respects or that have critical points of difference |
false cause | assume that because two events are associated in time, one must have caused the other |
single cause | attributing only one cause to a complex problem |
slippery slope | assumes that a given event is the first in a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome |
ad hominem | attack on the person rather than the argument |
straw man argument | create a weak argument, attribute it to the other side, then tear it apart |
nonsequitur | conclusion not related to the evidence |
bandwagon | everyone is doing it, therefore it is good |
red herring | divert attention from the subject by introducing an irrelevant issue |
either/ or reasoning | creates a false dichotomy |
authorship | is the author clearly identified? what are his/ her qualifications? |
sponsorship | who is the sponsoring organization for the website? |
recency | how old is the website? |
numerical data | are statistics representative? are statistical measures used correctly? are statistics from a reliable source? |
statistics | to quantify ideas use sparingly identify source explain round off use visual aids to illustrate |
testimony | quote or paraphrase accurately use from qualified source from unbiased sources identify the people you quote |
problem solution outline | the goal is to change an attitude. when your audience is unaware of the problem or how serious it is or is hostile or skeptical. |
comparative advantages | everyone agrees there is a problem, but there is a lack of agreement on the solution. |
motivated sequence | your audience agrees with you, but has not acted. want to mobilize your audience to take a specific action. |