click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Phil. Final Exam
Philosophy Final Exam
Question | Answer |
---|---|
What is Ralph Waldo Emerson's idea of self-reliance? | Self-reliance is putting faith in your personal ideals and convictions over those of society. Following your personal ideals regardless of the social acceptance is being self-reliant |
Plato's Allegory of the Cave - belief | Men in cave, see the shadows on the walls and assume about the real world. Stand for regular people |
Plato's Allegory of the Cave - knowledge | People on the inside manipulating the shadows, but still don't have a full understanding of the outside. Stand for the government |
Plato's Allegory of the Cave - understanding | The man who escapes the cave and sees a tree for the first time, then comes back to tell the others what he saw. Stands for philosophers |
The value of philosophy | the basis for education (asking questions about beliefs and issues), enriches our imaginations, opens our minds, teaches us that there are other options than what we initially believed |
David Foster Wallace and the Default Setting | Our default setting is self-centered. Escape it by recognizing, knowing when it influences you, intending to change the setting, and imagining other people's lives as more important in the moment. |
Inductive arguments | Only likely or probable, questions concerning the future are ALWAYS inductive |
Deductive arguments | Conclusion is meant to logically follow given the premises, with no room for error |
Strength of an argument | Used to evaluate inductive arguments, on a spectrum from strong --> weak, where strong = more likely and weak = less likely |
Validity | Used to evaluate deductive arguments, only valid and not valid, questions whether conclusion necessarily follows given the premises |
Soundness | For deductive arguments, the truth of the premises |
Cogency | For inductive arguments - cogent = strong and true premises, uncogent = everything else |
Formal Fallacies | For deductive arguments only - affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent |
Gambler's Fallacy | Common informal fallacy, "I failed many times, so next time I won't fail" |
False Cause Fallacy | Common informal fallacy, making correlation = causation |
Bandwagon | Common informal fallacy, "everyone else is doing it, you should too" |
Begging the Questions | Common informal fallacy, circular reasoning or missing a key premise |
Ad Hominem | Common informal fallacy, attacking the person rather than the argument (can be either personal or circumstantial) |
Equivocation | Common informal fallacy, changing the meaning of a key word halfway through the argument |
Red Herring | Common informal fallacy, change the argument partway through to distract from the point |
Appeal to Unqualified Authority | Common informal fallacy, appeal to authorities that are not qualified to speak on certain issues (eg political scientist on biochemistry) |
Slippery Slope | Common informal fallacy, conclusion depends on an unlikely chain reaction |
Strawman | Common informal fallacy, one arguer distorts the other's argument to make it more wrong, ALWAYS 2 ARGUERS |
Appeal to Pity | Common informal fallacy, think ASPCA commercials, appealing argument using pity |
Appeal to Force | Common informal fallacy, appealing argument using threats or violence |
Elizabeth Anderson and 2nd Order Capacities | All people have a 2nd order capacity, the capacity to make a judgement on scientific data using research, but they don't use it due to time, effort, want to protect values, etc |
Mind-Body Problem | An attempt to explain how exactly a person's mental and physical states interact |
Memory-chain View | The self is just the historical narrative that led up to the present day |
Physicalism | All actions are biochemically oriented, there are no mental processesu77777777as7" |