Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

AP Psychology unit 3

social psychology

TermDefinition
social psychology the scientific study of how we think about, influence, and relate to one another
social cognition (our social behaviour stems from this) the mental process associated with the ways in which people perceive and react to otter individuals and groups
attribution theory A theory that describes how people explain their own and others' behavior person's disposition + the situation
dispositonal attribution type of attribution in which you assign responsibility for an event or action to the person involved
Kelley's theory the differences between people result from the different ways that we predict and interpret events in the world around us
KT- consistency how similar does this individual acts in the same sitation over time?
KT- distinctiveness is the situation similar to other situations? -->witnessed someone else's behaviour
KT- consensus how have others reacted in the same situation?
situational attribtion type of attribution in which you assign responsibility for an event or action to the circumstances of the situation
fundemental attribution theory overestimating an individuals disposition and understimates the situation example= concluding someone is an extrovert/introvert based on one situation
false consensus theory tendency for people to overestimate the number of people who agree with them
FAT- individualist western cultures are more often attribute behaviours to personal disposition
FAT- collectivist eastern clutures are more sensitive to the influence of the situation. Example= germany tend to be collective due to their past W vs E
self serving bias tendency to take credit for good outcomes (personal dispositon) and blame negative outcomes on external factors Exampls: 5 on AP psych- I am so good at psych vs 1 on AP psych- Ms cole is a bad teacher
just world bias tendency to think that bad things happen to bad people 'you get what you deserve' 'she was wearing hardly anything, she was asking for it'
confirmation bias tendency to cherry pick information that confirms out beliefs
halo effect when one triat of a person is used to make an overall judgement example: if you are attractive, you are smarter, more popular or funnier
attitudes feelings often infleunced by our beliefs, that predispose us to respond in a particular way to onjects people or events
mere exposure effect a general consensus is that the more someone to exposed to soemthing, the more he or she will come to like it
attitudes are most likely to affect behaviours when external factors are limited and when the attitude is: stable, specific, easily recalled
The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) a dual process thoery which describes the change of attitutes
central route persuasion deeply processing the content of the message
periphral route persuasion other parts of the message including the delivery example: music used in advertisements addition: if someone is attractive they are more likely to influence
factors that influence their persuasion level of education, the way it is presented or arrousal
compliance strategy (CS)- foot in the door small requests followed by a large request
CS- door in the face big request followed by a smaller one that is more reasonable
CS- norms of reciprocity people have the tendency to feel obliged to reciprocate
CS- mutual linking promotes in group behaviour example: sports team
Richard La pierre- attitudes don't completely predict behaviours experiment with asians and restaurants. 90% said they would not serve asians but only one restaurant did not.
conformity change in a person#s behaviour as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group (imagined- if I don't do this, I won't fit in)
deindividuation individual becomes a member of a group and loses their sense of individuality due to the group's beliefs --> causes diffusion of responsibility
internalisation the transition between role play and internalisation (making it a part of who you are) is very fast. At first you may have to make a counscious effort to follow the social prescriptions of the role but soon enough you become it. --> visual stimuli
Zimbardo's case study prisoners and guard simulation to test conformity. guards were put in uniforms to internalise their roles. it had to be shut down becasue it was looking like a threat. prisoners revolted and guards harmed
normative Social Influence influence resulting from a person's desire to gain approval or avoid disapproval
majority Influence minority infleunce change in belief or behaviour in response to real or imagined social pressure 2:the power of one or two individuals to sway majorities
cognitive dissonance theory (CDT) the mental tension/discomfort (dissonance) felt when our actions and attitudes (cognitive) do not coincide example: eating fast food every night is seen as an undesirable behaviour but since the individual goes to the gym 3 times a week, it is ok.
Leon Festinger 1957 when we become aware of the clash, we want to relieve the tension so we bring our attitudes in line with out behaviour
Asch case study participants were shown a line and then 3 different lines to see which was one was the same as the original. They were put in a group with 6-8 confederates to see how they conformed to what the group said was right
naive participants a participant who has not previously taken part in a particular research study and has not been made aware of the experimenter's hypothesis
social contagion spread of a behavioural pattern, attitude or emotion from person to person, group to group through suggestion, propaganda, rumour or observation
mimicking example: yawning, scratching, rubbing, expressions
mood contagion mimicking emotions
contagious pathways internet
herd mentality people act the same way or adapt as the people around them. IGNORE thier feelings and FOLLOW the herd
Milgrim case study learner and teacher. teacher shocked the learner when he/she answered the question wrong. confederate was always the learner and was not harmed. Teacher was encouraged to finish the experiment. Lab coat dressed experimenter oversaw the experiment
MCS- conclusion experiment: people are likely to follow oders given by an authorataive figure as 65% people shocked their learner at max voltage
MCS- factors that effect the experiment proximity, location, uniforom, dissenter (someone who disagrees with the established norms), legitimate authority, binding factors, cultures, destructive authority (Trump)
situational variables aspects of the environment that might affect the participants behaviour
binding factors aspects of the situation that allow the person to ignore or minimise the damaging effect of their behaviour example: he was foolish to volunteer
obedience form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order from someone with authority and the power to punish
group think- Irving Jarvis when members of the group surpress their doubts about an idea discuessed/supported by the majority of the group --> most likely to occur in a cohesive group w a rick heavy decision
social facilitation tendency to perform tasks better or faster in the preseence of others example: ella started singing at a young age performs really well when she is on stage
social inhibiton tendency to perform worse at a new skill in the presence of other people example: public speaking infront of an audience
social loafing larger group = more loafing people put less effoty when they are in a group becuase of the diminished responsibility
group polarisation tendency for someone to undertake more extreme attitudes following exposure to a group discussion than he/she would normally. easier to manipulate when you are younger
in group and out groups favoring members of one's in group over members rather than the out group THESE GROUPS DEPEND ON THE SITUATION
social categorisation process by which people are placed into groups based on characterstics like race, gender and ethnicity
altruism to act for the benefit of another person that yields no consequences for yourself and/or could result in a cost to you --> an unselfish regard for the welfare of others
truely altruistic gained absolutely nothing from helping someone else more happy=more altruistic
reasons for why we help: social exchange social learning 1: weighing up the cost-benefit of thr action. maximise benefit and minimise cost 2: we have been taught to help through social norms (reciprocity- an expectation that people will help and hot hurt those who have helped them)
social responsibility norms the idea that we should help those who need our help even when the cost outweighs the benefit --> more religious families face more social responsibility
bystander effect tendency for any given bystander to be less likely to give and if other bystanders are present
single individual high concentration- compelled to help becuase thye are the only ones who feel responsibility
large group of individuals reallocate responsibilty
conflict compatibility of actions, goals or ideas problems that occur between in and outs group
superordinate goals shared goals that override differences among people that require their cooperation
shared environment stimulus people who experience the same create a cooperative in group identity example:9/11 all U.S citizens came together
mediator relationships between people end due to the lack of communication and this is why mediators exist. they are a third party who help the individual's compromise
concillation when in and out group bias becomes so strong certain peace strategies don't work
grit graduated and reciprocated initiatives in tension reduction small steps to reach a compromise
social traps pursuing own self interests rather than group's which ends in destructive behaviour exmaple: I do not want to spend extramoeny on a fuel efficient car besides my 1 car isn't going to make a huge difference
mirror image persuasion mutual views held by conflicting people. example: both see themselves as right and others wrong
self fufilling prophecy a belief which becomes internalised and becomes reality Jay does not like his English teacher, and he think that the teacher thinks that he is not a good student. Jay slouches at his desk and gazes out the window instead of paying attention in class.
contact negative contact increases dislikin and vice versa face to face has been proven to forge positive attitudes
cross racial ...reduces prejudice example: contan with homosexuals improves perceptions
stereotyping generalised belefs either positive or negative about a group of people. Most often exaggerated
prejudice undeserved attitude towards a group of people (thought)
discrimination unjustifiable negative behaviour otwards a group of people (action)
ethnocentrism one race/ethnivity is superior to others looks down of them
explicit we are aware of how we behave
subtle we are aware but does not lead to behaviour changes
implicit unaware of our attitide
vicitm blaming they must have deserved it
modelling pejudice is learned through modelling
hind sight blaming knew it all alonf effect amplifies victim blaming by saying " I totally knew that was gonna happen"
scape goating when an individual is blamed as an outlet for a negative emotion blame others so we feel better about yourself
own race bias ethnically wired to recognise our own race
own age we recognise our own age
heuristics mental shortbuts that enable snap judgements
out group homogeniety the in group are more diverse the out group are all the same
availability tendency for people to base their estimates on events frequency, or how quickly it comes to mind vivid events- information stored we recall info when something is more relatable
instrumental aggression an attempt to satisfy a goal or purpose
hostile aggression happens becuase a person feels pain, anger and frustration
bio- amygdala excessive high actvity
bio- frontal lobe reduction/diminished activity
bio- face to width is linked to testosterone high width to height= aggressive tendencies
serotonin is a neurotransmitter which is involved w aggression
alcohol/drugs disinhibitor= slows brain activity that controls judgement
social cognitive theory reinforcement and modelling maintains personality both shapes and is shaped by the environment
father absent home more likely to commit a crime
aversive events events that cuase us to act aggressively
social scripts media that help shapes situations
sexual aggression scenes or rape and sexual abuse
Created by: aeshamitra
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards