Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Psych Law Chapter 13

TermDefinition
liable responsible for alleged harm
damages whether injured party should receive any money to compensate their losses and how much
dual-process models capture individual jurors' thought processes as they attend to and evaluate evidence presented during a trial; rationally and deliberately evaluating content of info or reacting to it quickly and intuitively without careful analysis
story model core cognitive process involved in juror decision-making was construction of a story or narrative summary of the events in dispute
schema mental structure that aids in the processing and interpretation of information
evidentiary strenght strength of evidence; most important determinant of jurors' verdicts
psycholinguistics study of how people understand and use language
recency effect judge's instructions will have a more powerful impact on a jury's decision when they are given late in the trial
primacy effect instructions will have their most beneficial effect if they are presented first
jury nullification implicit power to acquit defendants despite evidence and judicial instructions to the contrary
extralegal factors irrelevant information such as defendant's background or appearance
aversive racism most white jurors are motivated to avoid showing racial bias and, when cued about racial considerations, they tend to render colorblind decisions; low explicit, high implicit
liberation hypothesis when the evidence in case clearly favors one side, juries will decide the case in favor of the side with the stronger evidence; ambiguous evidence allows jurors to rely on their assumptions, sentiments, and biases (extralegal evidence affects verdicts)
limiting instruction evidence of a defendant's prior record can be used for limited purposes only: to gauge the defendant's credibility but not to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the charged offense
propensity evidence evidence of other crimes or wrongdoing; typically inadmissible because of its potential for prejudice
outcome severity severity of an injury or accident
defensive attribution explanation of behavior that defends us from feelings of vulnerability
inadmissible evidence evidence that is presented in court but is unrelated to the substance of the case
reactance theory instructions to disregard evidence may threaten jurors' freedom to consider all available information; jurors may respond by acting in ways that restore their sense of decision-making freedom
thought suppression trying to suppress a thought makes people more likely to think about it
juror bias juror's predisposition to interpret and understand information based on past experience
predecisional distortion jurors will distort their evaluation of the evidence n a direction that supports their verdict choice
sympathy hypothesis sympathy plays only a minor role in civil jurors' judgments
informational social influence compelling information, data, or interpretation convinces a juror that her personal perspective was incorrect or incomplete, and that it makes sense to change her mind
normative social influence juror simply goes along with the group's decision in order to be conciliatory
verdict-driven deliberation jurors take a straw poll very early in their discussion; reveals general sentiment of the group and establishes factions that see things in different ways; each faction attempts to gain support and argue
evidence-driven deliberation jurors do not take an early vote; review crucial pieces of evidence in order to reach an agreed-upon consensus about how to interpret evidence; takes longer but is more satisfying
Created by: words_for_food
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards