Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Social Influence P2

Psychology Case Studies for Social Influence

Case StudyYearAimDetails of CaseTerms Associated with Study
Asch - Chaitra 1951 to investigate whether social pressure will affect one's ability to conform Asch measured the number of times each subject conformed to the majority while answering questions. He found that 74% of the subjects conformed at least once across 15 trails. normative influence, informational influence, Asch Paradigm, normative social influence, conformity,
Geert Hofstede (Julia & Ashley) 1997 To explain patterns of human behaviors in different cultures. -1117000 employees from 40 countries -Six trends dimensions 1. Individualism vs collectivism 2.Power distance index 3. Masculinity and Femininity 4. Uncertainty avoidance index 5. Long-term vs short-term 6. Indulgence vs restraint uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, power distance, masculinity/femininity, cultural dimensions
Torres et Al (Daniela & Camila) 2012 to investigate the effect of discrimination on acculturative stress 669 participants from Midwest Region of US. Identified as Mexican, Mexican-American, Chicano. Questionnaire to measure: perceived discrimination, acculturative stress, psychological stress. Measured integration into mainstream culture Correlational ex. Behavioral orientation Acculturative Stress Psychological distress Discrimination
Bond and Smith - Angelina and Allison 1996 to investigate Asch paradigm cross-culturally they conducted a meta-analysis of 133 replications of Asch's study from 17 different countries comparing cultures and collectivism vs individualism collectivism vs individualism, conformity, social influence
Barry et al. - Gabriela Lotze 1959 To investigate the effect of different child training practices on behavior around the world 1) identified types of child training practices around the world (age 5 - adolescence) 2) Measured from 46 societies 3) Used existing data to categorize societies as high food and low food accumulating The results showed that high food accumulating Enculturation: the process by which culture is pass ed from one generation to the next and through which individuals become members of society Behavior: the way in which one acts or conducts oneself Obedience: compliance with an order, request, or law
Amy Cuddy (from Ted Talk) (Lisa Maarek) 2010 To suggest that those who adopted the practice of "power-posing" could cultivate feelings of confidence and inner power. Her TED talk on the benefits of power posing were increasing in popularity. Many people believed her methods to work, and she received several critiques of judgement, going against her claims. increase in testosterone, decrease in cortisol, deeper feelings of confidence
Steele and Aronson - Delya 1995 to see how stereotype threat affects test performance in African Americans defined stereotype threat as being at risk of confirming, as self-characteristic, a negative stereotype about one's group aggressiveness and stereotypical stress
Tajfel and Turner, et al. (Carolina Lotze) 1979 To test if grouping was enough to cause prejudice between groups of very similar people -64 14-15 year old boys - separated on being over/underestimators' or being more accurate when looking at a dot plot -given money to reward/ punish -gave more money to those in their groups in-group, out-group, prejudice
Stanford Marshmallow Experiment (Mischell, et al. ) (Maria B and Louison B) 1972 to understand when the control of delayed gratification, the ability to wait to obtain something that one wants, develops in children. Observed 16 girls and 16 boys aged from 3 to 5 when placed in a room with no distractions, just a treat of their choice. They told the children they could eat the treat straight away but if they waited, they would get a second one. gratification, delayed gratification, high-delay, low-delay, reward
Robbers Cave (Muzifer Sherif) Paola Perez - Maria Polanco - Camille Shechter, Marta Yavorsky, Sofia Hernandez 1954 To create conflict and hostility between groups, and then employ interventions designed to reduce it. 12 year old boy WASPS, Robbers Cave State Park, 3 Weeks, Separation and bonding (team name and flag), Competitions (Sports, Tug of War, etc) and Rewards (Trophies, pocket knives, treats), Re-integration through superordinate goals Re-integration, Superordinate, WASPS, Separation, Aggression, Competition
Berry (Based on Barry et al's case study) MARS, Kelly 1967 to investigate why different cultures have different rates of conformity Individuals in rooms and were asked to do the Asch's line experiment. On the third trial, experimenter gave the individual a "hint" of what others in their culture chose. Observed if the participants conformed to the answers of their peers conformity, deception, culture
Allport's contact hypothesis (Nabiha Khan) 1954 to investigate whether contact between two groups can promote tolerance and acceptance based on observations, premised of four conditions in where intergroup contact will reduce prejudice 1) equal status 2) common goals 3) intergroup cooperation 4) supports of authorities and law customs. interpersonal, prejudice,
Aronson et al. (The Jigsaw Classroom) Florentina M. and Katherine M. 1978 To reduce hostility, conflict, stereotyping and discrimination between different groups of students in classrooms. divided the class into groups and assigned them each one piece of information. Each student learned their information and would be required to teach it to their group. Members would help each other learn and teach. decreased stereotyping and conflicts, cooperation, collaboration, group work, decreased prejudice, improved relationships, and increased self-esteem.
Created by: ybarreda
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards