click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Philosophy Week 2
Thinking Well
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Heuristics | mental shortcuts that make decisions quicker |
| Conformation Bias | only looking for evidence to prove your theory true, not any evidence to prove your theory wrong |
| System 1 | unconscious, intuitive gut responses, fast, frequent |
| System 2 | conscious, reflective or rational mind, slow, effortful, infrequent |
| Fallacy | a flaw in reasoning |
| Ad Hominem | person A makes a claim, person B attacks person A's claim therefore person A is wrong |
| Appeal to Common Practice | most people do X therefore X is correct "bandwagon" |
| Appeal to Nature | person A says a practice is natural therefore assumes it is morally good |
| Slippery Slope | event X has occurred so event Y will happen and be worse |
| Straw Man | person A makes claim, person B argues against a similar but different claim and attacks something person A never said |
| Principle of Charity | figure out the other persons best argument and attack it |
| Argument | a series of statements/reasons trying to prove a claim |
| Premise | statement taken for granted in context of an argument |
| Conclusion | a claim the argument is supposed to convince you to accept |
| Deductive Argument | premises intended to provide conclusive support |
| Induction | premises intend to provide probable support |
| True vs False | is there evidence or facts? |
| Valid vs Invalid | if i assume my premises are true is the conclusion also true? |
| Sound vs Unsound | true and valid, facts and form apply to the argument |
| Strong vs Weak | if i assume my premises are true does the conclusion likely follow? |
| Cogent vs Uncogent | true and strong, facts and form support argument |