Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Psych Research Pt 4

Experiments, Correlations, Parametrics

QuestionAnswer
Quasi-Experiment research technique that does NOT have random assignment, but in which the researcher manipulates the IV
Investigations research technique that does NOT allow researcher to infer causation; no random assignment
Experiment a study that has random assignment and the researcher manipulates the IV
Theory explanation for a phenomenon that can be falsified and that involves entities that cannot be directly observed
Hypothesis a tentative statement about the relationship between observable variables
Can't Prove the Null Hypothesis impossible to prove that the IV has no effect on the DV
Random Assignment occurs when every subject has an equally likely chance to be assigned to each IV level/to each treatment order
Random Selection occurs when every member of the population to which we would like to generalize the results has an equally likely chance of being chosen to participate in the study
Internal Validity the extent to which your research provides a valid test of the relationship between the IV and DV
External Validity the extent to which the results of your research can be applied outside the research situation
Alpha the probability of making a Type I error given that our experiment found an effect of the IV on the DV
Beta the probability of making a Type II error given that our experiment failed to find an effect of the IV on the DV
Levels of the IV specific values of the IV that the researcher uses in a study
Mean v. Median mean more affected by extreme scores but more consistent and easier to calculate
Frequency Distribution a graph showing the # of times each score occurred in a data set
Normal Distribution symmetrical, bell-shaped distribution
Positively Skewed Distribution distribution w/ a few extreme high scores
Negatively Skewed Distribution distribution w/ a few extreme low scores
Advantage of Experimental Approach allows researcher to infer a causal relationship between the IV and DV
How is the logic of experimentation ruined by confounds? if you have a confound in an experiment, then it is impossible to know whether it was the IV or confound that influenced the DV
Correlation Co-Efficient a statistic used to indicate the direction and strength of the inner relationship between two variables measured on an interval/ratio scale
Possible Values of a Correlation Co-Efficient -1 (perfect negative) to 1 (perfect positive)
Positive Relationship of Correlation as one increases, the other increases
Negative Relationship of Correlation as one increases, the other decreases, or vice versa
Why Correlation Cannot Determine Causation 1) unclear which variable is cause and which is effect (directionality problem) 2) 3rd variable problem
Mathematical Limitations of Correlations 1) poor at capturing non-linear relationships 2) greatly affected by extreme scores 3) can be lowered by range restriction
How to Find Main Effects in a Table or Graph Table: average each level of the IVs - if they are the same, then no reliable ME Graph: middle of each line - if they are the same, then no reliable ME
How to Find Interaction in a Table or Graph Table: subtract - if they are the same, then no reliable interaction Graph: if lines interact, then reliable interaction
Parametric Statistical Tests require assumptions about the distraction of the DV in order to obtain correct p-values; symmetrically distributed
Advantages of Non-Parametric Statistics less restrictive and often easier to calculate than parametric tests
Disadvantages of Non-Parametric Statistics tend to be overly conservative (type II errors) and no non-parametric test exists for some research designs (ex: factorials)
Participant Observation a naturalistic observation in which the researcher becomes a member of the group being observed
Created by: 2144066352316258
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards