Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password

Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Question

interpersonal needs theory
click to flip
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't know

Question

affection
Remaining cards (92)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

COMM 120 test #1

ch. 1-4

QuestionAnswer
interpersonal needs theory William Schutz (1966). our tendency to create and sustain relationships depends on how well they meet three basic needs: affection, inclusion, control
affection the desire to give and receive love and liking
inclusion the desire to be social and to be included in groups
control a desire to influence the people and the events in our lives
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 1968. we comm. to meet a range of human needs. basic needs must be satisfied before we can focus on those that are more abstract. physical needs for survival > safety & protection needs > belonging needs > self-esteem needs > self-actualization need
physical needs needs to survive. air, food, sex
safety needs protection. shelter
belonging needs social needs. want company, acceptance, and affirmation. inclusion, fun
self-esteem needs valuing and respecting ourselves and being valued and respected by others. shaped by how others communicate w/ us
self-acualization needs fully developing and using our unique talents, capacities, potentialities. growth.
participating effectively in a diverse society through interaction, people come to understand their differences and similarities, and this fosters personal growth
model a representation of what something is and how it works
models of interpersonal communication linear models, interactive models, transactional models
linear models a model that represents communication as a one-way process that flows in one direction, from sender to receiver. linear models do not capture the dynamism of communication or the active participation of all communicators
noise anything that distorts communication such that it is harder for people to understand each other. can be physical, psychological, semantic, etc.
interactive model a model that represents communication as a feedback process, in which listeners and speakers both simultaneously send and receive messages
feedback responses to messages. continuous. may be verbal, nonverbal, or both. may be intentional or unintentional.
transactional model a model of communication as a dynamic process that changes over time and in which participants assume multiple roles
communication continuum impersonal to interpersonal: it, you, thou
I-It communication impersonal communication in which people are treated as objects or as instrumental to our purposes
I-You communication communication midway between impersonal and interpersonal communication, in which the other is acknowledged as a human being but not fully engaged as a unique individual
I-Thou communication fully interpersonal communication in which people acknowledge and deal with each other as unique individuals who meet fully in dialogue
features of interpersonal communication selective, systemic, unique, processual, transactional, individual, personal knowledge, meaning creating
systemic taking place w/in multiple systems that influence what is communicated & what meanings are constructed. examples of systems affecting communication: physical context, culture, personal histories, previous interactions b/w ppl
process an ongoing, continuous, dynamic flow that has no clear-cut beginning or ending and is always evolving and changing
content meaning the content of, or denotative information in, communication. literal
relationship meaning what communication expresses about the relationship b/w communicators. the 3 dimensions of relationship-level meanings are liking/disliking, responsiveness, and power (control)
principles of interpersonal communication 1) we cannot not communicate 2) IC is irreversible 3) IC involves ethical choices 4)people construct meanings in IC 5) metacommunication affects meanings 6) IC develops and sustains relationships 7) IC is not a panacea 8) IC effectiveness can be learned
ethics the branch of philosophy that deals with moral principles and codes of conduct. b/c IC affects people, sometimes profoundly, it always has ethical implications
symbol an abstract, arbitrary, and ambiguous representation of a phenomenon
metacommunication communication about communication. when excessive, as in unproductive conflict interaction, metacommunication becomes self-absorbing and diverts partners from the issues causing conflict
guidelines for interpersonal communication competence develop a range of skills, adapt communication appropriately, engage in dual perspective, monitor your communication, commit to effective and ethical communication
interpersonal communication competence proficiency in communication that is interpersonally effective and appropriate. competence includes the abilities to monitor oneself, to engage in dual perspective, to enact in a range of communication sills, and to adapt communication appropriately
person-centeredness the ability to perceive people as unique and to differentiate them from social roles and generalizations based on their membership in social groups
dual perspective the ability to understand both your own and another's perspective, beliefs, thoughts, and feelings
monitoring observing and regulating your own communication
self a constantly evolving, processual understanding of oneself that grows out of the process of interacting with others and society and internalizing values and views of our identity that others reflect to us
particular others one source of social perspectives that ppl use to define themselves & guide how they think, act, and feel; people who are especially important to the self.
direct definition communication that explicitly tells us who we are by specifically labeling us and reacting to our behaviors. usually first occurs in families, then in interaction w/ peers and others
reflected appraisal the process of seeing and thinking about ourselves in terms of the appraisals of us that others reflect
upper a person who communicates positively about us and reflects a positive appraisal of our self-worth
downer a person who communicates negatively about us and reflects a negative appraisal of our self-worth
vulture an extreme for of downer who not only communicates a negative image of us but actually attacks our self-concept
self-fulfilling prophecy acting in a way that embodies expectations or judgments about us
identity script a guide to action based on rules for living and identity. initially communicated in families, identity scripts define our roles, how we are to play them, and basic elements in the plots of our lives
attachment style a pattern of relating instilled by the way a caregiver teaches the child who he or she is, who others are, and how to approach relationships
secure attachment style confidence in oneself & in relationships. secure mode instilled by caregiver who responds in consistently attentive, loving way to child; most common and most positive of the 4 styles. tend to be comfortable forming close bonds w/ others
fearful attachment style mode of relating instilled by caregiver in first relationship (usually parent-child) who communicates to child in consistently negative, rejecting, or abusive ways. ppl w/ fearful attachment styles tend to feel apprehensive & insecure a/b relationships
dismissive attachment style mode instilled typically early in life by a disinterested, rejecting, or abusive caregiver. individual later tends to dismiss others as unworthy and so does not seek close relationships. do not accept caregiver's view of them as unlovable (unlike fearful)
anxious/ambivalent attachment styles preoccupation w/ relationships and inconsistent behavior towards the partner. develops in childhood when a caregiver behaves inconsistently toward child, sometimes loving and sometimes rejecting or neglectful
generalized other one source of social perspectives that ppl use to define themselves and guide how they think, act, and feel; our perception of the views, values, and perspectives that are endorsed by society as a whole
ego boundary an individual's perception of where he or she stops and the rest of the world begins
social comparison comparing ourselves to others in order to form judgments of our own talents, abilities, qualities, etc.
guidelines for improving self-concept make a firm commitment to personal growth, gain and use knowledge to support personal growth, set goals that are realistic and fair, seek contexts that support personal change
self-disclosure the act of revealing personal information about ourselves that others are unlikely to discover in other ways
Johari Window developed in 1969 by Joseph Luft and Harry Ingram. model of the different types of knowledge that affect self-development. known/unknown to self vs. known/unknown to others (open, blind, hidden, unknown areas)
perception the active process of selecting, organizing, and interpreting people, objects, events, situations, and activities
contructivism the theory that we organize and interpret experience by applying cognitive structures called schemata
prototypes knowledge structures that define the clearest or most representative example of some category
personal constructs bipolar mental yardsticks by which we measure people and situations along specific dimensions of judgement
stereotpyes predictive generalizations about people and situations
script a definition of expected or appropriate sequences of action in a particular setting. scripts are one of the four cognitive schemata
interpretation the subjective process of evaluating and explaining perceptions
attribution an internal account of why something happens or why someone acted a certain way
self-serving bias the tendency to attribute our positive actions and successes to stable, blobal, internal influences under our control, and to attribute our negative actions and failures to unstable, specific, external influences beyond out control
fundamental attribution error overestimating the internal causes of others; behavior and underestimating the external causes
influences on perception physiology, age, culture, cognitive abilities, self
culture beliefs, understandings, practices, and ways to interpret experience that are shared by a group of people
standpoint the knowledge and perspective shaped by the material, symbolic, and social conditions common to members of a social group
cognitive complexity in our interpretation of experience, the number of constructs used, how abstract they are, and how elaborately they interact to create perceptions
empathy the ability to feel with another person, to feel what she or he feels
implicit personality theory our often unconscious assumptions about what qualities fit together in human personalities
guidelines for improving perception and communication recognize that all perceptions are partial and subjective, avoid mind reading, check perceptions w/ others, distinguish b/w facts and inferences, guard against the self-serving bias, guard against the fundamental attribution error, monitor labels
mind reading assuming that we understand what another person thinks or how another person perceives something. often a harmful practice b/c mind reading denies the other person the chance to explain their own thoughts or feelings
arbitrary random or not constrained by necessity. symbols are arbitrary b/c there is no necessary reason for a particular symbol to stand for a particular referent
ambiguous subject to multiple meanings. symbols are ambiguous b/c their meanings vary from person to person and context to context.
abstract removed from concrete reality. symbols are abstract b/c they are inferences and generalizations abstracted from a total reality
principles of verbal communication language and culture reflect each other, the meanings of language are subjective, language use is rule-guided, punctuation shapes meaning
linguistic determinism the theory that language determines what we can perceive and think. this theory has been largely discredited, altho the less strong claim that language shapes thought is widely accepted
communication rules shared understandings of what communication means what behaviors are appropriate in various situations
regulative rules communication rules that regulate interaction by specifying when, how, where, and w/ whom to talk about certain things
constitutive rules rules that define what communication means by specifying how certain communicative acts are to be counted
punctuation defining the beginning and ending of interaction or interaction episodes
symbolic abilities language defines, language evaluates, language organizes perceptions, language allows hypothetical thought, language allows self-reflection
totalizing responding to a person as if one aspect of his or her life were the totality of the person
loaded language an extreme form of evaluative language that relies on words that strongly slant perceptions and thus meanings
hate speech language that dehumanizes others and that reflects and often motivates hostility toward the target of the speech
speech community a group of people who share norms, regulative rules, and constitutive rules for communicating and interpreting the communication of others
guidelines for improving verbal communication engage in dual perspective, own your feelings and thoughts, respect what others say about their feelings and thoughts, strive for accuracy and clarity,
I language language in which one takes personal responsibility for feelings w/ words that own the feelings and do not project responsibility of the feelings onto others
you language language that projects responsibility for one's own feelings or actions onto other people. not recommended for interpersonal communication
static evaluation assessments that suggest that something is unchanging. "Bob is impatient" is a static evaluation
indexing a technique of linking our evaluations of speech and events to specific times or circumstances, to remind ourselves that evaluations are not static or unchanging
Created by: mdcooper
 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards