click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Schools of Theory
Basic schools of thought in management theory
| School and Year | Developers; Pros; Cons |
|---|---|
| Quantitative Management (1940s-PD) | Contemporary; WW2 Military; Pros: applied mathematic techniques; Cons: does not account for human behaviour |
| Organisational Behaviour (1950s-PD) | Contemporary; McGregor, Likert; Pros: encouraged employee effectiveness, explored human organisational processes; Cons: ignored situational factors |
| Systems Theory (1950s-PD) | Contemporary; Bernard, Katz, Khan; Pros: org. seen as an open system, synergies exist, multiple solutions to any given problem; Cons: no definition to manager’s functions or duties |
| Contingency Theory (1960s-PD) | Contemporary; Burns and Stalker and Lawrence and Lorsch; Pros: managerial action depends on contingencies; Cons: cannot identify all contingencies, there are other managerial duties |
| Total Quality Management (1970s-PD) | Contemporary; Deming and Juran; Pros: quality achieves competitive advantage, do things right the first time; Cons: ignores structure and strategy |
| Organisational Culture (1980s-PD) | Contemporary; Peters and Waterman, Ouchi, Deal and Kennedy, and Pascale and Athos; Pro: importance of orgs. culture in orgs. success; Cons: unscientific, discredited studies |
| Scientific Management (1898-PD) | Classical; Taylor, Gantt, and the Gilbreths; Pros: applied scientific principles; Cons: simple view of motivation, ignored role of external environment |
| Bureaucracy (1920s-PD) | Classical; Weber; Pros: structure emphasising efficiency and stability; Cons: ignored human element and external environment |
| Human Relations (1927-PD) | Classical; Mayo, Roethlisberger and Maslow; Pros: importance of social an psychological factors in influencing performance; Cons: ignored role of formal work group and worker rationality |
| Administrative Management (1916-PD) | Classical; Fayol, Follet, Bernard, and Urwick; Pros: universal principles of management for senior executives; Cons: ignored external environment |