click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Quals
The crazy amount of shit that I'm going to attempt to remember
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Brewer (1991) | Optimal Distinctiveness Theory. Identification with social groups plays role in satisfying conflicting motivations of assimilation (group inclusion) and differentiation. |
Tajfel, Billig, Bundy, & Flament (1971) | Created minimal groups paradigm. Assessed impact of social categorization on intergroup behavior in situations where self-interest and prior attitudes weren't present. Mere categorization is sufficient produce in-group favoritism, not outgroup derogation |
Mummendey & Otten (1998) | Mere categorization is enough for in-group favoritism but not outgroup derogation. In neg domain ppl systematically elaborate the categorical info and conclude that minimal group distinction is not legit basis for differentiation. |
Otten & Epstude (2006) | Argue that novel group acquires pos connotation because of self-anchoring processes. Because self is evaluated pos, novel in-groups are evaluated as pos by default. Alt explanation SIT and SCT "strive for pos social distinctiveness" motivation hypothesis |