click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Learning Exam
Psychology of Learning
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| inhibitory conditioning: standard paradigm | CS+=US then CS+CS-=no US |
| inhibitory conditioning: negative cs us contingency | CS+=US then CS-=no US |
| backward conditioning | US presented before CS indicating period of time will pass before next US |
| inhibitory conditioning must occur | in an excitatory context |
| CS- signals | the absence of the US |
| bidirectional response system | compare response to CS+ to response to CS- |
| compensatory response | offsets effects |
| compound stimulus test; summation | measure CS+ alone then measure the CS+ with CS- and calculate difference |
| retardation of acquisition | something effectively conditioned as CS- should be more difficult to condition as CS+ |
| factors involved in CS efficacy | novelty, salience, duration, and relevance |
| novel stimuli | produce better conditioning; avoids retardation of acquisition |
| cs pre-exposure | interference with conditioning due to prior exposure to the CS before conditioning; latent inhibition effect |
| us pre-exposure effect | interference with conditioning due to prior exposure to US |
| associative interference | prior exposure makes it more difficult for S to enter into new associations |
| memory interference | subjects remember pre-exposure phase when CS/US did not elicit conditioned response (passive) |
| learned irrelevance | pre-exposure teaches subject that CS and US are not in a predictive relationship (active) |
| in lab, a S is more salient when | it is ecologically relevant |
| US intensity can influence the _____ of the CR | form/topography |
| too much intensity | disrupts conditioning |
| higher order conditioning | procedure in which a previously conditioned S is used to condition a new S (CS2) CS1 eventually becomes a US |
| counterconditioning | procedure that reverses organism's previous response to S |
| counterconditioning demonstrates that | 2 S can become associated even though they both elicit strong R initially |
| sensory preconditioning | procedure in which one biologically weak S is repeatedly paired with another biologically weak S |
| conditioned homeostatic responses act | to bring body back into homeostatic balance |
| factors that affect higher order conditioning | interstimulus interval, similarity b/t CS1 and CS2, spatial contiguity, US magnitude, consistency in CS1/CS2 pairings, level of training |
| factors that affect sensory preconditioning | interstimulus interval, # of trials, motivational state |
| optimal interstimulus interval for artificial CS's | short interval |
| exception to short interstimulus interval | taste aversion paradigm |
| optimal interstimulus interval for eyeblink paradigm | milliseconds |
| S substitution model | organism comes to respond to CS in same way as responded to US |
| problem with S substitution model | CR topography differs from UR |
| behavior systems model | predicts the CS/US interval will determine form of CR b/c interval determines where CS will be integrated into system |
| blocking effect | when two CSs are both presented together with US and If CS1 has previously been associated US while CS2 has not, association formation b/t CS2 and US is impaired |
| Rescorla-Wagner model | effectiveness of US is determined by how surprising it is |
| RW model: unexpectedly large US= | basis for excitation (increase in associative value) |
| RW model: unexpectedly small US= | basis for inhibition (decreased associative value) |
| comparator hypothesis | the CS becomes associated with US b/c it has cues that stand out amongst all other environmental cues |
| instrumental conditioning relies on _____learning | stimulus-response |
| Thorndike's Law of Effect | if R made in presence of S is followed by a satisfying event then the association b/t the S-R is strengthened. Conversely, R following unsatisfying events will weaken the S-R association |
| ____ is NOT a part of the law of effect | OUTCOME |
| Instrumental C occurs when the outcome | depends on or is contingent on the subject's behavior |
| Instrumental C acquisition | association b/t S-R |
| Instrumental C extinction | stop the outcome by offering no reward for R in presence of S |
| spontaneous recovery | animal presented w/ S makes R and outcome/reward occurs |
| reinforcer | something that increases the rate of the behavior that it follows |
| + Rx | adds something appetitive and increases likelihood of reoccurrence |
| -Rx | takes away something aversive and increases likelihood of reoccurrence |
| + Punishment | adds something aversive and decreases likelihood of reoccurrence |
| - Punishment | take away something appetitive and decrease likelihood of reoccurrence |
| discrete technique | allows the animal to make only one R before restarting |
| free operant procedure | animal may freely R but R required is the operant R defined in terms of effect it has on the environment |
| shaping | rewarding successive approximations toward the eventual goal |
| differential reinforcement | maximize effectiveness of punishment by providing alternative (punish some behaviors while reinforcing others) |
| characteristics of effective punishment | consistency, not followed by + Rx, immediate, logical consequence of offense, meaningful |