Busy. Please wait.
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
or

Username is available taken
show password

why


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
We do not share your email address with others. It is only used to allow you to reset your password. For details read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Remove ads
Don't know
Know
remaining cards
Save
0:01
To flip the current card, click it or press the Spacebar key.  To move the current card to one of the three colored boxes, click on the box.  You may also press the UP ARROW key to move the card to the "Know" box, the DOWN ARROW key to move the card to the "Don't know" box, or the RIGHT ARROW key to move the card to the Remaining box.  You may also click on the card displayed in any of the three boxes to bring that card back to the center.

Pass complete!

"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards




share
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Peds - Legal issues

Legal issues & state resources: head start, early intervention, dept of edu

QuestionAnswer
Historical overview - Services provided to “crippled kids” - affected by poliomyelitis in hospitals and special schools - Special schools excluded some kids - Exclusion philosophy went til 1975- Public Law
Special schools established in 20th century for kids with: - polio - Spastic paralysis - Cardiac disorders - Erb’s palsy - Bone & joint TB - Club feet - Osteomyelitis
1954: Brown vs Board of Ed - Desegregation of Schools - “Separate is not equal”
1961: President Kennedy established President’s Panel on Mental Retardation
1965: Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Funding and minimum standards for public edu for kids
1971: PARC v. Commonwealth of PA - Free appropriate ed in least restrictive environment - parent involvement - re-evaluations
1972: Mills v. Board of Ed of DC - All kids no matter how severe the disability - MR or behavioral problem must be provided for by ed system
1972: Marc vs Maryland Right to: tuition subsidies - transportation - inclusion
1975: The Federal Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Included clause which mandated states to reform institutions and provide a plan for de-institutionalization
1975: Public Law- The Education for All Handicapped Children Act - Free and appropriate public school ed for all school aged (6-21) kids with disabilities - Emphasized individualized services to meet unique needs of child - Related services included (PT, OT etc)
**Key Elements of Edu for All Handicapped Children Act - Zero Reject - Least Restrictive Environment - Right to due process - Nondiscriminatory evaluation - Individualized Education Plan (IEP) - Parent Participation - Related Services
Zero Reject All kids entitled to education including kids with severe disabilities
Least restrictive environment -Kids w/disabilities included in public/private schools or other facilities - use supplementary aids and services child needs it to be ed w/normals - disabled kids only moved to special classes or separate schools if can't have successful ed with aids
Least restrictive environment 2 - Regular classroom for school age children - Point of debate - Services are individualized -> continuum of intervention location
Least restrictive -> most restrictive environment - Regular school in community/neighborhood - Regular school outside community - Special Ed. School - Instruction at home - Residential facility
Right to Due Process - Protected rights of kids with disabilities and their parents - Impartial hearing - Right to representation by lawyer - Right to appeal - 1986- reimbursement for legal fees if court case is won.
Nondiscriminatory Evaluation - Tests and placements were found to be discriminatory in many school systems - No one test can be used as sole criterion for placement - Mainly in cognitive and language testing but what are the implications for PT?
Parent Participation - Participate in the development of IEP - Grant permission for an evaluation - Restrict information release - Access to records - Request hearing
Related Services -Provided “to assist child with disability to benefit from special ed” -Interpretation different in different schools -Include PT, OT, Speech, counseling, recreation, therapeutic rec etc.
1986: Education for All Handicapped Act (EHA) amendment Extended services to infants, toddlers and young children with disabs and their families
Edu for All Handicapped Act addresses what needs (4) - Development of infs & todds with disabs - Decr edu costs - Minimize need for institutionalization - Help families meet needs of infs & todds with disab -Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP)introduced
Edu for All Handicapped Act to address needs (3 cont'd) - Financial @ to states to develop early intervention (EI) programs (voluntary) - Coordinate payment for EI services from Fed, state, local & private sources - Help states provide quality EI services (expand and improve existing)
1990: Reauthorization and revision of EHA and renaming Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
IDEA amendment - Added autism & TBI to be eligible - Required Transition services for students 16+ yrs - Added @ive technology and rehab counseling as related services
1991: Amendments & reauthorization - Addressed transition from EI to Part B programs (free appropriate edu 3-21) - IFSP for kids 3–6 yrs old (Part C)
1997: IDEA amendment -Related services + transition services -Changed: related services not required to attend IEP meetings ->should attend if appropriate -Private schools included in funds -Help students succeed in general curriculum -Emphasize inclusion
When did PT services begin in special schools? 1930’s
IDEIA 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Edu Improvement Act, **but still use IDEA
IDEIA involves -refine/reorganize previous amendments -disability is natural part of human experience, doesn't diminish right of individuals to participate/contribute to society
IDEA 2004 - universal design principle is part of @ive Technology Act of 1998 - @ive technology and services let kid benefit from edu environment
Section 504, originally part of Rehabilitation Act of 1973 -recipients of federal funding provide equal opportunities for people with disab -kid can receive related services even if not eligible for special ed
State Advisory Panel -required for each state -help state develop & report info to govt -comments on rules & regulations -must have disabled people on panel (majority)
Personnel standards state requires qualifications displayed
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act 2001 amendment -accountable for results -emphasize evidence based procedures -more parental options -more local control and flexibility
NCLB states that -all kids will read -progress measured by statewide standardized tests
NCLB implication for kids with disab special ed students have to test and show academic progress
Head Start: how it began -meet needs of disadvantaged preschool kids -8 wk program in 1965
Head Start: ages Early Head Start: 0-3, Regular 3-5
Head Start to serve the homeless kids 2007, needed a mailing address before
Head Start: benefits -family stability -Decr repeating grades, enrolling in special ed -Decr crime costs, welfare dependency -Incr test scores, employment and earnings by age 20 -Decr age 5-9 mortality
Head Start: Comprehensive program -Preschool edu -social services -medical & dental care -work with parents as well
Head Start: negative reports -early benefits that fade -function at lower level than peers if not sent to different school
Revisions of Americans with Disab Act (ADA) -protect job of people with disab -protect parents of kids with disab from being denied a job (anticipated health insurance cost) -transportation -physical structures
Mandatory reporting -call right away if abuse suspected -otherwise possible 12 months in jail -PTs document, not investigate -Reporter protected if reports found not true
6 models of interaction Unidisciplinary, Intradisciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, Transdisciplinary, Collaborative
Unidisciplinary - professional working alone, not team approach - should rarely or never be used in edu setting
Intradisciplinary -same professionals working together -not collaborating with others
Multidisciplinary -2+ disciplines/professionals -integrated & coordinated services
Interdisciplinary -emphasize teamwork during eval & developing programs -role definitions relaxed
Transdisciplinary professionals working with others across traditional disciplinary boundaries
Collaborative - transdisciplinary + integrated service delivery -natural routines, natural environment
4 models of service delivery -medical vs edu -direct model -consultative -monitoring
Medical vs Educational -in terms of purpose and regulation -define difference bc of payment -overlap in settings, address the whole child -must follow state practice act
Direct model -therapist is primary provider -traditional model -emphasize on motor skills -should be combined with other delivery models
Consultative -services in learning environment implemented by appropriate team members -PTs meet with others, demonstrate activities -Professionals receiving consultation responsible for outcomes
Monitoring -PT instructs team, regularly contacts child to check status and outcomes -can be used as transition from direct to no service or vs versa
Created by: neej