Save
Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

ppsych 3

QuestionAnswer
Trait-descriptive adjectives words that describe traits, attributes of a person that are characteristic of the person and enduring over time
Use of trait-descriptive adjectives connotes consistent and stable characteristics
Dispositions traits
BC traits are central concepts in personality psychology they must be precisely formulated/ defined ( ex. Species is defined)
Individuals differ in many ways that are both characteristic and enduring
Crucial goal for personality psychology identify most important ways that individuals differ
Taxonomy an organized scheme within which to assemble individual traits
Some view traits as ________ of persons that______ behavior internal properties, cause
Some don’t make assumptions about ___ and only use traits to _____ person’s behavior causality, describe
Refers to something inside causing person to act in a certain way desire, need, want
Internal individuals carry desires, needs, and wants from one situation to the next
Desires and needs are presumed to be ____ causal
Causal explain behavior of individuals who possess the traits
Internal desire ____ external behavior influences
Psychologists who view traits as internal dispositions don’t equate traits with external behavior in question (foo & diet example)
Traits can lie dormant capacities remain present even when behaviors aren’t expressed
Believe traits can lie dormant psychologists who view traits as internal dispositions
To view traits as causes of behavior you have to rule out other causes
Proponents of descriptive summaries make no assumptions about internality or causality
Descriptive summary viewpoint trait attribution merely describes expressed behavior
Descriptive summary use traits to describe a trend in a person’s behavior
Descriptive summary- we must first identify and describe important differences between people
Descriptive summary- second we must develop causal theories to explain them
An illustration of the descriptive summary formulation Act Frequency Formulation
Act frequency approach starts with notion that traits are categories of acts
3 key elements of Act Frequency Approach act nomination, prototypicality judgment, & recording of act performance
Act nomination a procedure designed to identify which acts belong in which trait categories
Act nomination procedures researchers can identify hundreds of acts belonging to various trait categories
Prototypicality judgment identifying which acts are most central to each trait category
Acts within trait categories differ in their prototypicality of the trait
Recording act performance use self-repots or reports from friends or spouses
Has been helpful in making explicit the behavioral phenomena to which most traits refer Act Frequency Approach
Act Frequency Approach has been helpful in identifying behavioral regularities & exploring meaning of traits
Show high levels of self-observer agreement extroversion & conscientiousness
Show low levels of self-observer agreement agreeableness
Can be used to predict important outcomes in everyday life Act Frequency Approach
Act Frequency Approach acts of deception & mate guarding
Lexical approach all traits listed & defined in the dictionary form the basis of the natural way of describing differences between ppl
Starting point for lexical approach natural language
Statistical approach uses factor analysis to identify major personality traits
Theoretical approach use theories to identify important traits
Lexical hypothesis all important individual differences have become encoded within the natural language
In the English language there is an abundance of trait terms codified as adjectives (18,000)
2 criteria of identifying traits for the lexical approach synonym frequency & cross-cultural universality
Cross-cultural universality more important an individual difference in human transactions, the more languages will have a term for it
The more phenotypic (observable) the trait there should be a word for it in virtually every language
Problem with lexical strategy personality is conveyed through nouns & adverbs too
Goal of statistical approach identify the major dimensions or coordinates of the personality map
Most commonly used statistical procedure factor analysis
Covary go together
Factor analysis identifies groups of items that covary, but tend to not covary with other groups of items
Factor analysis provides a means for organizing thousands of traits
Factor loading indicate the degree to which the item correlates with the underlying factor
Statistical approach you get out only what you put in to it
Statistical approach atheoretical- no prejudgment about which variables are important
Theoretical approach dictates which variables are important to measure
Example of theoretical approach sociosexual orientation
Sociosexual orientation men and women will pursue one of two alternative sexual relationship strategies
Norman & Goldberg used lexical approach and then factor analysis
Lexical strategy can be used to sample trait terms
Factor analysis provides structure and order to trait terms
Hans Eysenck model is most strongly rooted in biology
Eysenck developed a model based on traits he believed were highly heritable & had a likely psychophysiological foundation
Eysenck PEN
Eysenck extroversion, Neuroticism, psychoticism
Eysenck’s model each of 3 traits subsumes a large number of narrow traits
Typical high scorer of neuroticism tends to be a worrier, overreactivity on the negative emotions
Proves valuable in grouping together narrower traits factor analysis
Men tend to score twice as high as women on psychoticism
Eysenck’s model hierarchical nature & biological underpinnings
Eynsenck’s model supertraits-> narrow traits-> habitual acts
Lowest level of Eynsenck’s model specific acts
Charles Spearman invented factor analysis
Cattell followed vitamin researchers by naming discovered personality factors with letters
Cattell believed true factors of personality should be found across different types of data (S-data & T-data)
Cattell’s taxonomy 16
Cattell developed a strong empirical strategy for identifying basic dimensions of personality
Timothy Leary & Jerry Wiggins circular (circumplex) representations of personality
Interpersonal traits difference that pertains to what people do to & with each other
Wiggins argued that trait terms specify different kinds of ways in which individuals differ
Wiggins interpersonal traits
Wiggins defined interpersonal traits as interactions between ppl involving exchanges
Wiggins 2 resources that define social exchange love & status
Wiggins circumplex provides an explicit definition of interpersonal behavior giving love & granting status; Denying love & status
3 types of relationships in Wiggin’s model adjacency, bipolarity, & orthogonality
Adjacency how close the traits are to each other in the circumplex
Traits that are adjacent are positively correlated
Bipolarity traits are located at opposite sides of the circumplex
Traits that are bipolar are negatively correlated
Orthogonality traits that are perpendicular to each other in the circumplex
Traits that are orthogonal have zero correlation, completely unrelated
Allows one to specify with greater precision the different ways traits are expressed in actual behavior orthogonality
Key advantage of circumplex model alerts investigators to gaps
Limitation of circumplex models limited to 2 dimensions
I surgency or extraversion
II agreeableness
III conscientiousness
IV emotional stability
V openness-intellect
Cattell used which of Allport & Odbert’s four categories stable traits
Cattell ended up with 35 clusters of traits
Fiske took Cattell’ 35 and kept 22
Fiske first person to discover a version of the 5-factor model
Tupes & Christal identified precise structure of 5-factor model
5-factor model surgency, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, & culture
2 major ways of measuring big five taxonomy self-ratings of single-word adjectives & self-ratings of sentence items
Lewis Goldberg has done the most systematic research on the Big Five using single-word trait adjectives
Costa & McCrae sentence-length item format of Big Five NEO-PI-R
NEO neuroticism-extraversion-openness
PI personality inventory
R revised
Provide subtlety & nuance to big five traits facets
Those who use questionnaire items prefer label of openness/ openness to experience
Those who start with lexical & use adjectives as items prefer label of intellect
Cardinal feature of extraversion social attention
Self-handicapping tendency to create obstacles to successful achievement to protect self-esteem
Neuroticism self-handicapping
Good grades H-conscientiousness & H- emotional stability
Risky sexual behavior H- extraversion, H- neuroticism, L- conscientiousness, L- Agreeableness
Alcohol consumption H-extraversion, L-conscientiousness
Pathological gambling H-neuroticism, L-conscientiousness
Aggression neuroticism & H-agreeableness
Mount Everest Climbers extraverted, emotionally stable, & H-psychoticism
Happiness H-extraversion & L-neuroticism
Engage in volunteer work H- agreeableness & H-extraversion
Forgiveness H-agreeableness, H- emotional stability
Leader H-extraversion, H-agreeableness, H-conscientiousness, H-emotional stability
Migrate H-openness & L-agreeableness
Have kids H-extraversion & H-emotional stability
Touched by intimate partner H-agreeableness & H-openness
Created by: alxt
 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards