Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Contracts: Offers
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Gibson v Manchester City Council | C claimed letter was an offer which he accepted by returning the form. HL: no binding contract. 'may be prepared to sell' lacked clarity and certainty |
| Storer v Manchester City Council | An offer must have Clarity and Certainty |
| Fisher v Bell | Display of goods are an ITT |
| Pharmaceutical Society of GB v Boots Cash Chemists | Display of goods are an ITT |
| Lasky v Economy Grocery Stores | Display of goods are an ITT (US) |
| Partridge v Crittenden | Advertisements are an ITT |
| Harris v Nickerson | Advertisements are an ITT |
| Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co | Advertisements exceptions |
| Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus Store | Advertisements exceptions general rule does not apply where advertisement amounts to an unilateral offer |
| Spencer v Harding | Invitation to Tenders are generally ITT |
| Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust Co. of Canada (CI) Ltd | ITT Tenders exceptions Auctions; express commitments to accept highest/lowest bids is an offer; 2 firms, sealed bids, highest wins: H: seller obliged to sell |
| Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council | ITT Tenders exceptions: express commitment to consider all bids H: contractual duty to consider - offer was made to consider |
| Payne v Cave | ITT Auctions bidder makes offer and auctioneer accepts through fall of hammer s.57 SGA 1979 |
| Warlow v Harrison | ITT Auctions without reserve is 2 contracts: Unilateral that no reserve is there and highest bidder wins and Bilateral between Highest Bidder and Auctioneer |
| Barry v Davies | ITT Auctions approved Warlow |
| Taylor v Laird | Communicatioin of offer. An offer has no validity unless and until it is communicated to the offeree so as to give the offeree the opportunity to accept or reject it |
| Hyde v Wrench | Rejection |
| Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-cell-o Corporation | Rejection |
| Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v McLean | Rejection |
| Routledge v Grant | Revocation |
| Byrne v Van Tienhoven | Revocation must be Communication |
| Dickinson v Dodds | Revocation Communication 3rd parties |
| GNR Company v Witham | Revocation of Unilateral offers |
| Errington v Errington & Woods | Revocation Unilateral offers |
| Daulia v Four Mill Bank Nominees Ltd | Revocation Unilateral offers |
| Shuey v United States | Revocation Unilateral offers Communication |
| Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co. v Montefiore | Lapse of time |
| Bradbury v Morgan | Lapse by Death |
| Duff's Executors' Case | Lapse by death |
| Kennedy v Thomassen | Lapse by death |
| Financings Ltd v Stimson | Lapse by Non-fulfilment of a condition |
| Lapse of an offer (3) |
Created by:
freckle_speckle