click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Crim Manslaughter
Criminal Law Ireland Manslaughter
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What is the definition of manslaughter? | Unlawful killing whether intentional or not where the mens rea for murder is not present due to a defense (in voluntary manslaughter) or involuntariness (as in involuntary manslaughter). |
| Is the Actus Reus for manslaughter the same as for murder- and what is it? | Yes: Unlawful killing |
| In what 2 ways does Manslaughter differ from murder? | 1) Involuntary manslaughter - no mens rea as no intention to kill 2) voluntary manslaughter -intention to kill but mitigated by defence of provocation, self defence or diminished responsibility - mitigate -what otherwise murder = manslaughter |
| What are the two main categories of manslaughter? | Voluntary and involuntary |
| What are the three categories of voluntary manslaughter? | Defined by the three defenses of a) self defense, b) provocation and c) diminished responsibility. |
| What are the three types of involuntary manslaughter? | a) assault manslaughter b) criminal and dangerous act manslaughter c) Criminal negligence manslaughter (Dunleavy & Cullough) |
| What is assault manslaughter | Intended less than serious injury but more than trivial |
| Give a case example of assault manslaughter where merely throwing stones at a fleeing victim caused unintentional death. | DPP v Daley and McGhee (1980) |
| Can a mere threat of assault constitute assault manslaughter? | Yes: R v Holzer (1968) - threat of violence is psychic assault |
| What must prosecution show to prove Criminal and Dangerous Act Manslaughter? | a) INTENTIONALLY commited unlawful act b) was a CRIME c) act was significant cause of death d) was objectively dangerour (R v Holtzer [1968] |
| One of the 4 things the prosecution must prove in a Criminal and Dangerous Act manslaughter is that the act was objectively dangerous- does this mean that it is no defence for the accused to say that they did not think what they were doing was dangerous? | Yes: the subjective view of the accused as to danger is irrelevant - it is an objective test People (AG) v Crosbie and Meehan (1966) |
| What is criminal negligence manslaughter? | High degree of negligence (gross- not mere inadvertence) objectively assessed (not subjective intention as in murder) must negligent (not merely dangerous activity [driving]-Dunleavy)Negligent - Cullough (1999) fairground ride no maintenance) |
| More than dangerous driving is required for Criminal negligence manslaughter - what is a person charged with if they are merely driving dangerously? | Dangerous driving -Section 53 (1) Road Traffic Act, 1961 |
| How was "dangerous driving" defined in People (AG) v Quinlan (1963)? | "reasonably prudent motorist..[in] circumstances…recognise…direct and serious risk of harm…" |
| What is the penalty for dangerous driving causing death under Section 53 Road Traffic Act ,1961? | Dangerous driving : 10 years imprisonment and fine of €15,000 |
| a HIGH degree of negligence (gross) is required for criminal negligence manslaughter per Dunleavy [1948] - how is this defined? | High degree of negligence (gross) - high risk and likelihood of serious injury - (not mere inadvertence as in civil) |
| Does it have to be proved in a case of criminal negligence manslaughter that the accused was aware that they were creating a risk that there was a high likelihood of serious injury? | No |
| How does criminal negligence differ from civil negligence in tort? | The test cor criminal negligence is objective whereas the test for negligence in tort is subjective |
| What is the punishment for manslaughter? | maximum Life Imprisonment - sec 5 OAPA 1861 |
| What is the difference between the punishment for mansalughter and the punishment for murder? | Murder = mandatory life sentence - Manslaughter - life is MAXIMUM sentence |