click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
AP LIT ANALYSIS
AP LIT HAMLET ANALYSIS
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| 1988 Analysis 1 B1 | This initial hesitation reveals that his mind immediately creates internal barriers to action by demanding spiritual validation before proceeding. |
| 1988 Analysis 2 B1 | This defensive stalling suggests that his reliance on empirical proof serves as a psychological safety mechanism to keep him safely detached from physical violence. |
| 1988 Analysis 3 B1 | This strategic redirection highlights the physical manifestation of his overthinking, as he chooses to channel his vengeful energy into a dramatical play rather than an actual assassination. |
| 1988 Analysis 4 B1 | This complex rationalization implies that his intellect actively manufactures religious excuses to avoid confronting the terrifying reality of committing murder. |
| 1988 Analysis 1 B2 | This blind violence illustrates an overcompensation for his prior reticence. He reacts purely by immediate reflex, so as not to once again become caught in a cycle of hesitation. |
| 1988 Analysis 2 B2 | This explosion of volatility conveys a complete lack of strategic thinking and instead acts out on a dangerous whim due to a profound disappointment in the passivity of his own emotions. |
| 1988 Analysis 3 B2 | This candid reflection indicates a sudden cognitive shift where he begins to value blind spontaneity over the paralyzing burden of structured intellect. |
| 1988 Analysis 4 B2 | This fierce vow proves that his erratic external actions are directly generated by intense psychological self-loathing over his prior inaction. |