click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
PY142 Exam 1
Units 1-3
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Research like a Court Case | 1) What's the evid 2) Is the evid consistent w/ claim 3) R there alt explanations |
| Types of Evidence | Intuitions Authority Natural/Clinical Observations (personal anecdotes) Research Studies |
| Observational Studies | No intervention, no cause and effect can be proven Quasi independent variable |
| Experimental Research | Intervention; random assignment - proves cause and effect True independent variable |
| Independent Variable | Variable/factor that's manipulated |
| Dependent variable | Measurement/assessment not concept Always quantified (construct validity - degree to which test/measurement accurately measures the abstract - is important) |
| Operational definitions | Define concepts based on operations used to measure it Can be through a test |
| Questions research methods answers | Frequency Association (concurrent or predictive (retrospective or prospective)) Causation |
| Frequency | Ask how and how did you choose who to ask How many, often, much Typically surveys/questionaires |
| Association | In the presence of factor A, factor B is more/less likely Concurrent (side by side questions), Predictive ((prospective/cohort) or retrospective/case-control)) |
| Prospective prediction | Cohort study Look at something and then follow up in the future |
| Retrospective prediction | Case-control Look at the patients with defect and compare to the controls, and then look at if they had the IV in life |
| Causation | causes are probabilistic/contributatory, not deterministic, doesn't guarantee |
| Establishing Cause and Effect | Association Temporal precedence Eliminate alternative explanations |
| Association | in the presence of factor A, B is more likely |
| Temporal precedence | Makes sure Cause comes before effect, not vice versa |
| Eliminate Alternative Explanations | Assigning to groups (experimental study) Ultimate prover of establishing cause and effect |
| Validity | Truth value |
| Numerical scale | Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio |
| Nominal | NO magnitude, interval, or absolute zero |
| Ordinal | Magnitude but NO interval, or absolute zero |
| Interval | Magnitude and Interval, but NO absolute zero |
| Ratio | Has a magnitude, interval, and absolute zero BEST for construct validity |
| Criteria for accuracy/Reliability | Consistency - reproduce w/ measurement, necessary for validity but not sufficient for accuracy Validity - accuracy and truth value - is measurement appropriate and accurate |
| Reliability types | Test- retest (give measurement more than once and get consistent results) Intra-rater reliability (agree w/ urself) Inter-rater reliability (someone else agree w/ u) Internal consistency/split-half |
| Validity | Define what measure is for, gold standard to compare measure to |
| Validation types | Criterion (gold standard) -Concurrent both measurement @ same time; self-report-> drug test -Predictive; test -> gold st (Sat-> Degree) Known groups Convergent/Discriminant (like inter-rated reliability) Archival record (inconsistent) |
| Open ended questions | Pros - Can say wtv, explain, can tell research things they didn't know Cons- categorize/scoring answers, nonsense responses, something might not pop to mind |
| Close ended questions | Pros- don't have to categorize/scoring answers, no nonsense responses, dont have to worry abt something not popping to mind Cons- categorize/scoring answers, nonsense responses, something might not pop to mind |
| Close ended questions | Exhaustive list (all possible answers) Mutually exclusive categories Symmetrical scale |
| Writing question guidelines | Easy words, short, painfully clear questions, AVOID double barreled questions, AVOID Biased/leading questions, AVOID negatives |