click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Head 7 Superior
Superior Courts procedure
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| The source of Judicial Authority in Zambia | The judicial authority of the Republic derives from the people of Zambia and judicial authority ought to be exercised in a just manner and in a manner that promotes accountability to the people of Zambia |
| The principles of Judicial authority and the independence of the Judiciary | Justice should be done to all, without discrimination; Justice shall not be delayed; Adequate compensation shall be awarded, where payable ADR, including traditional dispute resolution, ought to be promoted Justice should be administered without und |
| Limits to Traditional dispute resolution mechanisms | Contravention of the Bill of Rights Inconsistency with other provisions of the Constitution or other written law; repugnance to natural justice, morality and equity |
| That judicial authority vests in :: | the Courts who ought to exercise such authority in accordance with the Constitution of Zambia and others laws. |
| The Courts are under a duty to perform the following judicial functions | a) hear civil and criminal matters; b) hear matters relating to, and in respect of, this Constitution. |
| Proceedings of a Court should be in | public |
| System of Court The Judiciary consists of the superior Courts and the following Courts— scribed. | Subordinate Courts; Small Claims Courts; Local Courts; and Courts as pre |
| Except the Local Court, the rest of the Courts are Courts of | record |
| Superior Courts consists of the following Courts— | High Court; Court of Appeal; Constitutional Court; Supreme Court. |
| Article 121 of Constitution regarding rank of supreme and constittutional court | Supreme Court and Constitutional Court rank equivalently. |
| Functional independence of the Judiciary | In the exercise of the judicial authority, the Judiciary is subject only to the Constitution and the law and is not subject to the control or direction of a person or an authority. |
| Financial independence of the Judiciary | The Judiciary is supposed to be a self-accounting institution and ought to deal directly with the Ministry responsible for finance in matters relating to its finances. |
| The High Court consists of— | the Chief Justice as an ex-officio Judge; and such number of Judges as prescribed. |
| The High Court Jurisdiction (Article 134 of the Constitution) consists of | unlimited and original jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters; appellate and supervisory jurisdiction; jurisdiction to review decisions. |
| Unlimited Jurisdiction Means | Jurisdiction to hear any matter on any point of law. There is no cause beyond its competence and authority. The High Court has no territorial limits. |
| Though the jurisdiction is unlimited | it is not limitless. |
| The High Court must adjudicate in accordance with the law and must comply with | procedural requirements as held in Zambia National Holdings Limited & UNIP vs. A-Gen and Miyanda v The High Court |
| Original Jurisdiction | Means it’s a Court of first instance. You can commence an action or file Court process in the High Court. |
| The mode of commencement is determined by | the relevant statute or rule depending on the nature of the action. |
| The default position is that an action in the High Court is commenced by | a writ of summons and a full statement of claim. |
| Appellate Jurisdiction | Means the Court sits as an Appellate Court in certain matters as specified in various statutes. |
| Lands Tribunal Act No. 39 of 2010 in Section 16, provides that | appeal from the Tribunal go to the High Court (within 30 days). Lazarous Ndhlovu & Others v Headwoman Pwalakasa Mary Neube Appeal No. 111/2020. |
| Rating Act No. 12 of 1997in Section 36 provides for | appeals from the decision of the Rating Appeals Tribunal to the High Court. |
| Supervisory Jurisdiction of the High Court | A puisne Judge can review a case stated by the Magistrate. The High Court confirmed its supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court in [[Mwanza v The People (1976) ZR 154]], it was held that— “a decision of the Subordinate Court can come up before the High |