click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Physics Trials
Reconceptualisation of light
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Intro | Classical wave theory could not explain black‑body spectra or the photoelectric effect, prompting a shift to a quantised, dual model of light. |
| Planck 1900 | Planck solved the black‑body problem by assuming energy exchanges occur in discrete quanta. He derived the spectrum by letting oscillator energies be E=nhv introducing the constant ℎ and replacing the prediction that led to the ultraviolet catastrophe. |
| Einstein 1905 | Einstein proposed that light itself is composed of quanta (photons) with energy E=hv. He explained the photoelectric effect with the relation Kmax=, predicting a threshold frequency and that electron kinetic energy depends on frequency, not intensity. |
| Photoelectric experiments Millikan, 1916: | Precise measurements showed 𝐾max varies linearly with frequency and a clear threshold frequency exists; intensity changed current but not 𝐾max. Millikan’s data gave an accurate value for ℎ. |
| Compton scattering (1923): | X‑ray scattering from electrons produced a wavelength shift. The result matched a particle collision model conserving energy and momentum, showing photons carry momentum. |
| Critical analysis | Planck’s quantisation was initially a mathematical fix; Einstein gave it physical meaning by treating light as quantised particles. High‑precision experiments forced acceptance of particle aspects while wave phenomena remained valid. |
| Conclusion | The result was a reconceptualisation: light exhibits wave–particle duality, described by quantum theory where electromagnetic fields are quantised and interactions exchange discrete energy and momentum. |