Save
Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Vaughn Ch 3

Ethics

TermDefinition
Critical reasoning The careful, systematic evaluation of statements or claims
Statement An assertion that something is or is not the case
Argument A group of statements, one of which is supposed to be supported by the rest
Premise A supporting statement in an argument
Conclusion The statement supported in an argument
Indicator words Terms that often appear in arguments to signal the presence of a premise or conclusion or that an argument is deductive or inductive
Deductive argument An argument that is supposed to give logically conclusive support to its conclusion
Inductive argument An argument that is supposed to offer probable support to its conclusion.
Valid argument A deductive argument that does in fact provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion
Invalid argument A deductive argument that does not offer logically conclusive support for the conclusion
Strong argument An inductive argument that does in fact provide probable support for its conclusion
Weak argument An inductive argument that does not give probable support to the conclusion
Sound argument A valid argument with true premises
Cogent argument A strong argument with true premises
If p then q Conditional arguments
Modus Ponens (affirming the antecedent) (Valid) If p, then q. p. Therefore ,q.
Modus Tollens ( denying the consequent) (Valid) If p, then q. Not q. Therefore, not p
Denying the antecedent (Invalid) If p, then q. Not p. Therefore, not q.
Affirming the consequent (Invalid) If p, then q. q. Therefore, p.
Hypothetical Syllogism (Valid) If p, then q. If q then r. Therefore, if p then r.
Moral statement A statement affirming that an action is right or wrong or that a person is good or bad
Nonmoral statement A statement that asserts a state of affairs is true or false but do not assign a moral value to it
Fallacies Bad arguements
Begging the question The fallacy of arguing in a circle. Trying to use a statement as both a premise and a conclusion in an argument. p is true because p is true
Equivocation The fallacy of assigning two different meanings to the same term in an argument
Appeal to authority The fallacy of relying on the opinion of someone thought to be an expert who is not
Appeal to emotion The fallacy of trying to convince someone to accept a conclusion by appealing only to fear, guilt, anger, hate, compassion, and the like
Slippery slope The fallacy of using dubious premises to argue doing an action with lead to others actions that will result in disaster
Faulty analogy The use of flawed analogy to argue for a conclusion
Appeal to ignorance The fallacy of arguing that the absence of evidence entitles us to believe a claim
Straw man The fallacy of misrepresenting someone's claim or argument so it can be more easily attacked
Appeal to the person (Ad hominem) The fallacy of arguing a claim should be rejected solely because of the characteristics of the person who makes it
Hasty Generalization The fallacy of drawing a conclusion about an entire group of people or things based on an undersized sample of the group
Confirmation Bias Paying attention only to evidence that confirms our beliefs while ignoring opposing evidence
Availability error The tendency to rely on evidence not because it reliable but because its vivid or memorable
Motivated Reasoning Reasoning for the purpose of supporting a predetermined conclusion, not to uncover the truth
Dunning Kruger effect The common human failing of being ignorant of how ignorant we are
Created by: gmunnie
 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards