click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Queer Film Theory
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Britzman on the link to postmodernism | Not just what happens to queer bodies but also “something queer happens to the signifier – to language and to representation” |
| Warner's "heteronormativity" | “the pervasive and largely invisible heterosexual norms that underpin society” |
| McCann on queer theory's aim | "critiquing, destabilising, subverting and challenging normativity” |
| Halberstam's "transgender gaze" | When a film rejects the standard heterosexist demand to see "biological proof" or fit characters strictly into traditional male/female binaries |
| Butler on gender | Gender as a performative "citation practice" |
| Venkatesh on early LatAm cinema | “always maintained sexual and gender difference at a polite distance from the viewer” |
| Venkatesh on the aim of New Maricón Cinema | Encourages the viewer to actively engage with the discomfort through the use of the haptic |
| Venkatesh on how NMC defines characters | Beyond the didactic, resisting definition solely based on sexuality/gender |
| hooks' "oppositional gaze" | When marginalized viewers – specifically Black women – actively resist, question, and subvert mainstream media that excludes or misrepresents them, turning the “look” into a political tool for critical resistance |
| Henderson's "queer relay" | Tension between queer cultural production and the market: reaching wider audiences often means over-generalising to make films palatable, thus diluting the raw experience |
| Wearing on how cinematic representation can behave | “standing in for the larger group and making up for their lack of physical presence”, implying a sense of responsibility |
| Wearing on power dynamics | We must consider if they “speak on their behalf…or speak for them” |
| Dyer on subjectivity | We are “restricted by both the viewing and the reading codes to which we have access…and by what representations there are for us to view and read” |