Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Court Cases
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Brown v. Board of Education (year) | 1952 |
| Brown v. Board of Education (details of conflict) | Related to segregation of public school on the basic of race; African American students denied admittance to certain public schools |
| Brown v. Board of Education (Amendment) | 14th (Equal protection of law) |
| Brown v. Board of Education (Supreme Court Decision) | Racial segregation is unconstitutional |
| Brown v. Board of Education (outcome of decision) | racial integration of schools |
| Roe v. Wade (year) | 1971 |
| Roe v. Wade (details of conflict) | Texas law against abortions except to save a woman’s life |
| Roe v. Wade (Amendment) | 14th (right to privacy) |
| Roe v. Wade (Supreme Court Decision) | Privacy Protection and women’s right to decide if pregnancy should continue |
| Roe v. Wade (outcome of decision) | women have a right ot abortions |
| Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (year) | 2021 |
| Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (details of conflict) | a Mississippe law against abortions after 15 weeks |
| Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Amendment) | 14th |
| Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Supreme Court Decision) | Abortion laws are not unconstitutional |
| Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (outcome of decision) | Abortion can be outlawed by states |
| Katz v. United States (year) | 1967 |
| Katz v. United States (details of conflict) | a man was convicted based on a recorded phone call across state lines |
| Katz v. United States (amendment) | 4th (search and seizure) |
| Katz v. United States (Supreme Court Decision) | it is illegal to record phone conversations without cause |
| Katz v. United States (outcome of decision) | privacy rights were upheld in the technology age |
| Kelo v. New London (year) | 2005 |
| Kelo v. New London (details of conflict) | A woman’s property was seized by the local government and sold to private developers |
| Kelo v. New London (Amendment) | 5th (unlawful seizure) |
| Kelo v. New London (Supreme Court Decision) | Selling land to a private development company was lawful seizure because the community/economy benefitted from it |
| Kelo v. New London (outcome of decision) | expanded the definition of “public use” and cause backlash within most states |
| Malloy v. Hogan (year) | 1964 |
| Malloy v. Hogan (details of conflict) | a man was compelled to testify against himself and sentenced to jail |
| Malloy v. Hogan (Amendment) | 5th (right not to testify against oneself) |
| Malloy v. Hogan (Supreme Court Decision) | 5th amendment rights apply to citizens in state courts as well as federal courts |
| Malloy v. Hogan (outcome of decision) | states cannot violate a citizen’s rights |
| Mapp v. Ohio (year) | 1961 |
| Mapp v. Ohio (details of conflict) | a woman was changed after an illegal search by police |
| Mapp v. Ohio (amendment) | 4th (protection against unlawful searches) |
| Mapp v. Ohio (Supreme Court Decision) | State courts cannot violate the |
| Mapp v. Ohio (outcome of decision) | states cannot violate a citizen’s rights |
| Miranda v. Arizona (year) | 1966 |
| Miranda v. Arizona (details of conflict) | man convicted from forced testimony |
| Miranda v. Arizona (Supreme Court Decision) | people must be read their rights when arrested |
| Miranda v. Arizona (outcome of decision) | Miranda rights are read at arrests |
| New York Times Co. v. United States (year) | 1971 |
| New York Times Co. v. United States (details of conflict) | Nixon admin tried to block newspapers from publishing classified material |
| New York Times Co. v. United States (Supreme Court Decision) | A president cannot stop the news media from publishing |
| New York Times Co. v. United States (outcome of decision) | freedom of the press |
| Schenck v. Ohio (year) | 1919 |
| Schenck v. Ohio (details of conflict) | political activist encouraged men to dodge the draft as he claimed that WWI drafts were involuntary servitude |
| Schenck v. Ohio (Amendment) | 1st (freedom of speech) |
| Schenck v. Ohio (Supreme Court Decision) | Freedom of speech does not extend to speech that creates a “clear and present danger" |
| Schenck v. Ohio (outcome of decision) | Freedom of speech can be limited |
| Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (year) | 1968 |
| Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (details of conflict) | Public School student’s rights to protest |
| Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (Amendment) | 1st (Freedom of Speech) |
| Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (Supreme Court Decision) | Students do have the right to protest |
| Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (outcome of decision) | citizenship rights apply to students |
Created by:
Mrs.Maskelony