Save
Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

wais things

QuestionAnswer
Role of Psychological assessment assist diagnosis (87.5%); assist treatment recs 79.25%); inpatient setting (89.7%); forensic applied setting (100%); Small snapshot in time
Considerations for psychological assessment duty to client not computer, don't take interpretations at face value, consider behavioral data, consider narrative statements; life-impacting power; evaluator projected into the report
Assessment integration of data and qualified interpretation; differentiating symptom patterns and diagnoses; distinguishing situational from enduring behaviors; predicting how the person will respond in different situations; finding treatment
Assessment components identifying the problem; consider the referral question; selecting measurement instruments; integrating sources of information about the problem, deriving/reporting conclusions, opinions, and recs ; not a one-time process
Atkins v Virgina (2002) Daryal Atkins and William Jones robbed ATM/murder; Atkins had mildly mentally retarded (59 on WAIS 3); sentenced to death; determined that intellectually disabled individuals cannot be subject to death penalty
Flynn effect the observed rise over time in standardized intelligence test scores
Francis Galton developed first comprehensive individual test of intelligence; adults and giftedness; "eugenics" and improving racial stock/ hella racist
Alfred Binet created first intelligence test - Binet-Simon instrument (mental age v chronological age)
Binet-Simon instrument limitation Intelligence is far too broad a concept to quantify with a single number; Intelligence is influenced by many factors; Intelligence can change over time; Intelligence can only be compared among children of similar backgrounds
Lewis Terman translated and adapted Binet-Simon scale for use in the US (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale); justification for segregated system of education
Charles Spearman developed the idea of general intelligence (g); several factors underlie this common factor of intelligence
James McKeen Cattell mental test; "father" of assessment psychology and generated scientists' interest in psychological tests
Army Alpha Written test developed to screen recruits; First group-administered intelligence test; Given to almost 2 million recruits by the end of World War I; Established a clear racial hierarchy of performance with White, American-born recruits scoring highest
Army Beta Administered in cases where recruits were unable to read or hear
David Wechsler first developed an assessment in 1939; published the Wechsler Adult intelligence Scale (WAIS) in 1955
Jean Piaget's Theory children are all born with a basic mental structure on which all learning and knowledge is based; Intelligence develops through continually shifting balance between the assimilation of new information into existing cognitive structures
Lev Vygotsky's Theory All intellectual abilities are social in origin; Language and thought first appear in early interactions with caregivers and continue to develop through contact with others.
Biological Theories Investigators have turned to the study of the brain as a basis for new ideas about what intelligence is and how to measure it; Many aspects of brain anatomy and physiology have been suggested as potentially relevantto intelligence
Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC)Theory retained spearman's g; fluid and crystallized intelligence
Fluid Intelligence ability to solve novel problems by using reasoning; ability to learn new things
crystallized intelligence knowledge-based ability; influenced by education and experience
CHC 10 Broad Abilities Fluid Intelligence; Crystallized Intelligence; Quantitative reasoning; Reading and writing ability; Short-term memory; Long-term storage and retrieval; Visual processing; Auditory processing; Processing speed; Decision/reaction time/speed
Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory Analytic (components of problem solving); creative (use of experience in ways that foster insight); practical (ability to read and adapt to context of everyday life)
Intelligence mental activity directed toward purposive adaptation to, selection and shaping of, real-world environments relevant to one's life.
Gardener’s Multiple Intelligences Theory intelligence is not a single ability but a set of distinct, independent capacities. He originally identified eight types of intelligence—such as musical, spatial, and interpersonal—people possess different strengths and learn in unique ways
ethical guidelines Inappropriate use of testing measures; Breach of confidentiality; Cultural bias; Privacy concerns; Authority to release of test data; Use of outdated measures (validity concerns)
The Role of the Evaluator Assessment should be conducted only in context of a clearly defined professional relationship; nature, purpose, conditions of relationship should be discussed informed consent/assent; client should understand assessor's role ; rapport
Evaluator Factors Technical competence, Cultural competence, Counter-transference
Client Factors Preparedness, Motivation and engagement, Emotional state
Assessment Competencies Examiner must have proper training, Adequate graduate course work AND Substantial supervised practical experience
Requisite Evaluator Skills/Knowledge Ability to evaluate technical strengths and limitations of a test; Appropriate test selection; Knowledge of psychometric issues (i.e., test reliability and validity); Interpretation with diverse population
Extended knowledge of evaluators Knowledge of the relevant research on the measure; The constructs/variables being measured; Criticisms/limitations of the measure
Reliability Refers to degree of stability, consistency, predictability, and accuracy of a test
Classical test theory a psychometric framework that explains outcomes of psychological testing. CTT focuses on improving reliability through item analysis to minimized error. a person's observed or obtained score on a test is the sum of a true score and an error score
Standard Error of Measure Estimates how repeated measures of an individual (using the same instrument) tend to be distributed around their “true” score.
Alternate Forms Reliability if a trait is measured several times on same individual by using parallel forms of test, different measures should produce the same results
Split-Half Reliability Determining reliability for trait with a high degree of fluctuation Because test is given only once, items are split in half and two halves are correlated
Interrater Reliability Scoring between multiple scorers; Obtain series of responses from a single client and have two individuals score responses
Validity Test measures what it intends to measure & should produce useful information to clinicians
Construct Validity How well a test measures the concept it was designed to evaluate
Content Validity Representativeness and relevance of assessment instrument to construct being measured
Criterion Validity Extent to which an operationalization of a construct (i.e., in a test) relates to, or predicts, a theoretically related behavior or outcome (i.e., the criterion)
Wechsler's definition of intelligence the global capacity of a person to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his/her environment.
Full Scale Intelligence Quotient conceptualized as a global estimate of an individual’s current level of cognitive ability; It is a summary of the underlying abilities described by subsumed cognitive domain score estimates; calculate an FSIQ score by scoring 7 subtests; only 1 substitute
Classifications of Intellectual Ability Extremely Low (<69); Very Low (70-79); Below Average (80-89); Average (90-109); Above Average (110-119); Very High (120-129); Extremely High (>130)
Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) Measure of vc, application verbal skills and information to the solution of new problems, ability to process verbal information, ability to think in words, cognitive flexibility, and ability to self-monitor. Crystalized knowledge; Similarities and Vocab.
Visual Spatial Index (VSI) Measure of ability to think in visual images/manipulate them with fluence/speed, interpret/organize visually perceived material quickly, nonverbal reasoning,visual-perceptual discrimination, and visual spatial reasoning ability.Block Design/Visual Puzzles
Fluid Reasoning Index (FRI) Measure of fluid reasoning ability, visual-perceptual reasoning/organization, ability to think in visual images and manipulate them with fluency and relative speed, nonverbal reasoning, and visual-perceptual discrimination. Matrix Reasoning/Figure Weights
Working Memory Index (WMI) Measures auditory short-term memory, ability to sustain attention, numerical ability, encoding ability, auditory processing skills, cognitive flexibility, and ability to self-monitor; digit sequencing/running digits
Processing Speed Index (PSI) Measures visual-perceptual discrimination, speed of mental operation,psychomotor speed/attention/concentration, short-term visual memory, visual-motor coordination, numerical ability, cognitive flexibility, and ability to self-monitor.Coding/Symbol Search
General Ability Index (GAI) Provides an estimate of general intellectual ability, with reduced emphasis on working memory and processing speed relative to the FSIQ. (Similarities, Block Design, Matrix Reasoning, Vocab, Figure Weights)
Index Scores (VCI, VSI, FRI, WMI, & PSI) Each contain 2 subtests, (Requires scores for 10* subtests), Used for primary interpretation level
Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI) Provides an estimate of intellectual ability derived from working memory and processing speed tasks, with reduced emphasis on verbal comprehension, visual-spatial reasoning, and fluid reasoning abilities. (WMI + PSI)
Nonmotor Index Suitable for use when administered remotely; similarities, vocab, visual puzzles, matrix, figure weights, digit sequencing, naming speed quantity
Ancillary Index Scales inform selection of additional cognitive/neuropsychological testing measures (as part of a larger battery)
WAIS-5 Reliability high nonclinical reliability overall (above .90) est-Retest Stability .93 for FSIQ; 78 to .91 for Index scale scores; 71 to .93 for subtest scores
Practice effects can lead to significantly elevated WAIS scores at retest due to prior exposure to the tasks/questions of the test; WAIS-5 practice effects have been found to endure two year or more years
Limitations of the WAIS-IV Lack of data supporting ecological validity; Potential for over-interpretation of subtest and index scores; Applicability of norms across ethnic and racial categories or socioeconomic backgrounds; Degree of subjectivity in scoring remains
VCI Primary Subtests: Similarities/Vocabulary; Secondary Subtests: Information/Comprehension/ One of the best predictors of overall intelligence
Similarities The examinee is read two words that represent common objects or concepts and describes how they are similar. Measures: Abstract thinking skills; Concept formation skills; Verbal reasoning; subtest 1/ 18 items
Vocabulary (For picture items) The examinee names the object presented visually. (For verbal items) The examinee defines words that are presented visually and orally; measures: language dev/word knowledge; subtest 7; 24 items
VSI Primary Subtests: Block Design; Visual Puzzles Secondary Subtests: (There are no secondary VSI subtests!) VSI is less influenced by educational background.
Block Design Working within a specified time limit, the examinee views a model and a picture, or only a picture of a design, and to recreate the design. Measures: Visual-motor skills, Ability to analyze geometric patterns, Part-whole recognition skills; subtest 2/14i
Visual puzzles Working within a specific time limit, the examinee views a completed puzzle and selects three response options that, when combined, reconstruct the puzzle; Measures: Visual processing skills; Attention to details; Recognition patterns; subtest 9; 25 item
FRI Primary Subtests: Matrix Reasoning; Figure Weights Secondary Subtests: Arithmetic; Set Relations FRI is less influenced by educational background than VCI
Matrix Reasoning The examinee views an incomplete matrix or series and selects the response option that completes the matrix or series. Measures: Non-verbal reasoning skills; Broad visual intelligence; Perceptual organization skills; subtest 3; 26 items
Figure Weights Working within a specified time limit, the examinee views a scale with missing weight(s) and selects the response option that keeps the scale balanced; Measures: Quantitative reasoning/Analogical reasoning; subtest 8; 28 items
WMI Primary Subtests: Digit Sequencing*; Running Digits; Secondary Subtests: Digits Forwards*; Digits Backwards; Letter Number; Sequencing; Symbol Span; Spatial Addition; M: higher order processes; Attention; Concentration; Mental control; Reasoning abilities
Digit Sequencing The examinee is read a sequence of digits and recalls the digits in ascending order Measures: Auditory recall; Short-term memory; Working memory; Subtest 4 and 5; 10 items
Running Digits The examinee is read a sequence of digits and recalls a specified number of recent digits in same order. Measures: Information recall/ processing and Perceptual organization skills; subtest 10; 10 items
PSI Primary Subtests: Coding/ Symbol Search Secondary Subtests: Naming Speed Quantity; Requires Visual perception/organization/scanning;Efficient production of multiple motor responses; Executive control of attention and sustained effort for 2 min
Coding Working within a specified time limit, the examinee uses a key to copy symbols that are paired with numbers. Measures: Psychomotor speed; Ability to absorb new material; Visual motor speed; subtest 6 135 items
Symbol Search Working within a specified time limit, the examinee scans a search group and indicates whether one of the symbols in the target group matches. Measures: Processing speed; Working memory with visual stimuli; subtest 11; 60 items
Information The examinee answers questions about a broad range of general knowledge topics. Measures: Factual knowledge; Retrieval of information from long-term memory; Influenced heavily by intellectual curiosity, quality of education, alertness to the environment
Comprehension The examinee answers questions based on their understanding of general principles and social situations. Measures: Factual information recall; Ability to understand complex questions and formulate answers; Knowledge of conventional standards of behavior
Arithmetic Working within a specified time limit, the examinee mentally solved arithmetic problems. Measures: Calculation skills; Problem-solving skills; Mental manipulation of number operations
Set Relations The examinee views circles depicting relationships and selects the response option that completes the set or best depicts the relations between the objects or concepts the words describe Measures: Abstract deductive reasoning; Logical thinking skills
Digits Backwards The examinee is read a sequence of digits and recalls the digits in reverse order. Measures: Auditory recall; Short-term memory; Working memory
Letter Number Sequencing The examinee is read a sequence of numbers and letters and recalls the numbers in ascending order and then the letters in alphabetical order. Measures: Ability to hold verbal information in memory while manipulating it; Auditory working memory
Symbol Span The examinee views a stimulus page of one or more abstract symbol(s) for a specified time and then selects the symbol(s) in sequential order from the options on a response page. Measures:Visual memory;Visual spatial capacity
Spatial Addition The examinee is shown, sequentially, two grids with blue and red circles for a specified time. They are then asked to create a new grid by combining the circles based on a set of rules
Naming Speed Quantity Working within a specified time limit the examinee names the quantity of squares inside a series of boxes as quickly as possible.
Administration 10* primary subtests – 60 minutes • FSIQ of less than 79: 43 minutes • FSIQ of 120 or greater: 68 minutes • (WAIS-IV 10 “core” subtests took 67-100 minutes)
raw score of 0 Examinee’s ability cannot be determined by the particular set of items A subtest score of zero IS permitted on some subtests; Substitution remains an option if indicated; if both subtests in an index domain are scored zero, index is invalidated.
WAIS-5 VS. WISC-V for 16 year old Clinical judgement of examiner; uspected of below average cognitive ability or with clinical diagnoses = WISC-V; Average or above average ability suspected = WAIS-5; If primarily Spanish speaking examinee with limited English proficiency – WISC-V Spanish
Basal The start/entry point established in a psychometric test; perfect score on the first two items administered,
Ceiling The discontinue point of a psychometric test; after consecutive incorrect or imperfect responses (specific rule varies by subtest)
Reverse Rule Extends the floor for examinees to establish a basal on a measure; Examinees can meet discontinue criteria while reversing
Queries used to elicit additional information when examinee’s response was incomplete, vague, or unclear; Only query when it is indicated by guidance in manual
Prompts used to teach or remind the examinee of the task; If no response, “Do you have a guess?”; Teaching items are similar to prompts, but have specific verbatim content and rules.
Spoiled response if elaboration of it (after query) reveals fundamental misconception = 0
Poor Response if elaboration (after query) does not improve original response = 1
Multiple Responses If new response is intended to replace a previous one, score only new (intended) one; If both a correct and incorrect response is given, ask “You said (x) and (y), which one did you mean?” Score response indicated as the intended one.
Common Errors Failing to query all verbal responses Assigning too many/few points to an answer (leniency by examiner); Failing to record examinee responses, circle scores, or record times; Failing to question responses when required by test manual
Created by: user-2021572
 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards