Save
Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or
show password
Forgot Password?
Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or
Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account. Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
edit
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

Phil Religion Exam 2

William Paley Natural Theology and Design Argument from Bio
David Hume Design Argument is inductive analogical argument (probable analogy)
Robin Collins Fine Tuning argument
William Lane Craig Moral Argument and Divine Command Theory
Aquinas leading proponent of theory of natural law, God is metaphysically necessary but not logically necessary
Aristotle Theory of Natural Law
J. L. Mackie Even if you can't have good without evil, we don't need the extent of evil that there is in the world
William Rowe Evidential Problem of Evil, Noseeum Inference
Alvin Plantinga Free Will Defense
Leibniz POE shows that we must be living in the best possible world because an omni-god only permits evil that is necessary for greater goods.
Stephen Wykstra Skeptical Theism
Design Argument 1. Watches and human eyes have complex structures which enable them to fulfill complex functions well. 2. Watches can fulfill complex functions bc product of intelligent design. 3. Human eyes are probably product of intelligent design.
Hume's Objections to Design Argument 1. Eyes and watches are not that similar 2. Even if argument does succeed, it proves smth less than God.
Natural Selection new species develop gradually and slowly through incremental change because of random variation, competition, inheritance, and survival of the fittest
Darwin's theory of evolution proves design arg wrong bc eye is the product of evolution and nat selection not design
Created by: 25pollijul
 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards