click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
EWG's + EDG's
OCHEM II: Exam 3
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What can EWG's and EDG's determine? | Play central role in determining stability, reactivity, and substitution patterns of aromatic systems |
| EWG's | Pull electron density AWAY from conj. pi system or aromatic ring through resonance or inductive events - DECREASE electron density in ring - DESTABILIZE carbocation intermediates in EAS - DECREASE reactivity in EAS - Often STABILIZE negative charge |
| Examples of EWG's | - Nitro group (NO2) - Carbonyl groups (C=O, including aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters) - Cyano group (CN) - Sulfuric acid group (SO3H) - Halogens (F, Cl, Br, I) *Inductively withdrawing,Resonance donating, Deactivating but o/p directing |
| EDG's | groups that push electron density INTO pi system or conj. ring through resonance or inductive effects - INCREASE electron density - STABILIZE carbocation intermediates in EAS - INCREASE reactivity in EAS - Often DESTABILIZE negative charge |
| Examples of EDG's | - Hydroxyl group (-OH) - Alkyl group (-CH3, -R) - Amino group (-NH2, -NHR, -NR2) - Alkoxy group (-OCH3) |
| How is the preferred product in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution (EAS) determined? | It's determined by the stability of the rxn intermediate following the rate determine step - More stable intermediate = lower activation energy = forms FASTER than. other possible products and MORE product obtained |
| Rate DETERMINING step for Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution (EAS) rxns | The nucleophilic attack of the aromatic |
| Rate LIMITING step for Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution (EAS) rxns | The nucleophilic attack of the aromatic pi bond on the electrophile, as the formation of the carbocation disrupts aromaticity |
| How is stability of an Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution (EAS) rxn determined? | Resonance Capabilities - attacks that result in a resonance structure with a more highly substituted (MORE stable) carbocation will be lower in energy; attacks that result in adjacent like charges will be LESS stable |
| Position(s) electron donating groups (EDG's) prefer | Ortho/para positions (although PARA typically preferred) - create resonance structures with more substituted carbocations |
| Position(s) electron withdrawing groups (EWG's) prefer | Meta -Meta position does not create unfavorable position of two like charges near each other (unlike o/p), so it's preferred |
| What do halogens do in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution (EAS) rxns | Halogens are the EXCEPTION - Highly electronegative and although technically EWG that deactivate benzene ring, they PREFER ORTHO/PARA positions |
| Relationship between electron density and rate of rxn | MORE electron rich aromatic ring is = FASTER rxn |
| Activators in EAS | A substituent that INCREASES rate of rxn relative to Hydrogen |
| Deactivators in EAS | A substituent that DECREASES rate of rxn relative to Hydrogen |
| Exceptions of EAS relative to activating and deactivating groups | - O-R and NR2 groups seem deactivating bc of electronegativity, but are actually ACTIVATING bc they can donate a lone pair of electrons into ring through resonance |
| Do EWG's increase or decrease acidity? And why? | EWG's INCREASE acidity - pulls electrons AWAY from acidic proton through induction or resonance - this stabilizes the negative charge of the conjugate base, so the stronger the acid |
| Do EDG's increase or decrease acidity? And why? | EDG's DECREASE acidity - pushes electrons TOWARD the acidic proton - this destabilizes the conjugate base bc of the extra negative charge - this makes the proton less likely to leave, therefore decreasing acidity |