click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
2.3 aims community
meeting aims of punishment community
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| How many hours of Unpaid Work (Community Payback) can offenders be required to complete? | Between 40 and 300 hours; |
| 4 things community service could include | Unpaid work Curfew Exclusion zone Participation in group programmes, such as anger management or drink‑driver courses. |
| 2 ways community service meets the aim of retribution | Curfews, exclusion orders and unpaid work restrict an offender’s freedom, acting as a form of punishment. Wearing high‑visibility Community Payback vests creates public accountability |
| 2 ways community service meets the aim of deterrence | The visible nature of Community Payback may discourage others from offending. Community sentences reduce reoffending more effectively than short prison terms, suggesting they have some deterrent effect. |
| By what percentage are community sentences more effective than short prison terms at reducing reoffending? | 8.3% |
| What percentage of all sentences are community sentences, according to the Bromley Briefings? | 9% |
| Two ways community sentences meet the aim of public protection | Limit offenders’ opportunities to offend through curfews, exclusion zones etc reducing direct risks to the public. Tackle underlying causes of offending—such as addiction, mental health issues or violent behaviour—helping to lower long‑term risk. |
| Two ways community sentences do not meet the aim of public protection | Offenders remain in community, so there always possibility they may still commit further offences despite restrictions. Protection relies on effective monitoring, and breaches or non‑compliance can occur before authorities intervene. |
| Two ways community service meets the aim of reparation | Unpaid work directly repairs harm — offenders complete tasks such as cleaning, restoring damaged property, giving back to the community High‑visibility Community Payback vests and public‑nominated projects make the act of making amends visible |
| Two ways community service does not meet the aim of reparation | Some harms—especially emotional trauma—cannot be repaired. The reparative impact can be limited, as the work may not directly address the specific harm caused to individual victims. |
| Two ways community sentences meet the aim of rehabilitation | Address the root causes of offending—such as addiction, mental health issues, unemployment or low education—through treatment programmes More effective at reducing reoffending than short prison sentences |
| What are the 12‑month reoffending rates for offenders on community sentences compared with those serving short prison sentences? | 34% (community) and 64% (prison) |