click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
PHL01_CO2_Set #5
š¤š2ļøā£2ļøā£ PHL01_CO2_Set 5 ā 40āCard MockExam Set - #5
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| A priori knowledge | Knowledge known independently of sense experience. |
| A posteriori knowledge | Knowledge gained only after observation or sensory experience. |
| Proposition | A statement that can be true or false. |
| Fact | A verified proposition supported by evidence. |
| Claim | A statement requiring further evaluation to determine truth. |
| Opinion | A judgment or belief influenced by perspective or interpretation. |
| Belief | A conviction not easily proven by facts alone. |
| Explanation | A statement assuming a claim is true and giving reasons for it. |
| Correspondence Theory | Truth is what matches objective reality. |
| Coherence Theory | Truth is what fits consistently within a belief system. |
| Pragmatic Theory | Truth is what is useful or beneficial in practice. |
| Constructivist Theory | Truth is shaped by social norms and cultural acceptance. |
| Consensus Theory | Truth is what a group collectively agrees is true. |
| Critical Thinking | Evaluating information to form a reasoned, logical judgment. |
| Analytical Thinking | Breaking information into parts to understand relationships and structure. |
| Why distinguish facts from opinions | To avoid bias and improve clarity in reasoning. |
| Ad Hominem | Attacking the person instead of addressing the argument. |
| Ad Baculum | Using threat or force instead of logical reasoning. |
| Ad Populum | Appealing to popularity as proof of truth. |
| Ad Verecundiam | Appealing to authority rather than evidence. |
| Ad Ignorantiam | Claiming something is true because it has not been proven false. |
| Ad Misericordiam | Using pity or emotion to replace a valid argument. |
| Red Herring | Introducing irrelevant information to distract from the issue. |
| Hasty Generalization | Drawing a conclusion from insufficient evidence. |
| Dicto Simpliciter | Applying a general rule to all cases without qualification. |
| Petitio Principii | Circular reasoning; assuming what must be proven. |
| Fallacy of Composition | Assuming what is true of a part is true of the whole. |
| Fallacy of Division | Assuming what is true of the whole is true of its parts. |
| Correspondence Bias | Judging personality solely based on actions, ignoring context. |
| Confirmation Bias | Seeking information that supports existing beliefs. |
| Framing Bias | Focusing on certain aspects of a problem while ignoring others. |
| Hindsight Bias | Believing you āknew it all alongā after an event occurs. |
| Conflict of Interest | Bias caused by personal involvement or vested interest. |
| Cultural Bias | Interpreting events based on oneās cultural standards. |
| First Speaker Role | Explains necessity or lack of necessity of the measure and conducts interpellation of the opposing first speaker. |
| Second Speaker Role | Explains beneficiality or harmfulness of the measure and questions the opposing second speaker. |
| Third Speaker Role | Argues practicality or impracticality of the measure and interpellates the opposing third speaker. |
| Researchers Role | Assist speakers with research, speech writing, question formulation, and fallacy spotting. |
| Interpellation | A structured questioning period used to challenge the opponentās arguments and assumptions. |
| Purpose of Debate in CO2 | Develops critical and analytical thinking through structured argumentation and evaluation. |
| Role of Evidence in Debate | Strengthens claims, increases persuasiveness, and reduces bias. |