click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
PHL01_CO2_Set #2
🤔📗2️⃣2️⃣ PHL01_CO2_Set 2 — Logical Fallacies - #2
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Ad Hominem | Attacking the person instead of the argument. |
| Ad Baculum | Using threat or force instead of reasoning. |
| Ad Antiquitatem | Appealing to tradition as proof of truth. |
| Ad Ignorantiam | Claiming something is true because it has not been proven false. |
| Ad Misericordiam | Using pity to replace a valid argument. |
| Ad Populum | Appealing to popularity as proof of truth. |
| Ad Verecundiam | Appealing to authority instead of evidence. |
| Ad Nauseam | Repeating an argument until it seems true. |
| Red Herring | Distracting from the issue with irrelevant information. |
| Dicto Simpliciter | Applying a general rule to all cases without qualification. |
| Fallacy of Composition | Assuming what is true of a part is true of the whole. |
| Fallacy of Division | Assuming what is true of the whole is true of the parts. |
| Hasty Generalization | Drawing a conclusion from insufficient evidence. |
| Petitio Principii | Circular reasoning; assuming what must be proven. |
| False Dilemma | Presenting only two options when more exist. |
| Slippery Slope | Claiming one step will lead to extreme consequences. |
| Straw Man | Misrepresenting an argument to make it easier to attack. |
| Post Hoc | Assuming causation from mere sequence. |
| Equivocation | Using ambiguous language to mislead. |
| Why fallacies matter | They weaken arguments and distort reasoning. |