Save
Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

SCOTUS - APGov

Required SCOTUS Cases for the AP Exam

QuestionAnswer
McCulloch v. Maryland background Congress created second national bank. Maryland tried to tax national bank. McCulloch refuses to pay tax.
McCulloch v. Maryland constitutional issue SUPREMACY CLAUSE: does state have power to tax federal? (Answer: No) Necessary and Proper Clause: does National Gov have power o set up a bank? (Answer: Yes)
McCulloch v. Maryland holding expanded Federal Power, limited state power, Gov has implied powers
US v. Lopez background Congress had passed the Gun Free School Zone Act using justification by the commerce clause, saying guns in school make kids feel unsafe, affecting their education, harming future economy. Lopez brings gun to school., charged by state
US v. Lopez charges State charges Lopez for bringing gun to school. Congress dismissed state charges and re charged him with federal criminal charge under the commerce clause
US v. Lopez constitutional issue Commerce Clause: does Congress have authority to regulate guns in school via commerce clause? (answer: no)
US v. Lopez holding Checks federal power (to make laws under commerce clause)
Citizens United v. FEC background BCRA, McCain Feingold banned corporations from spending prior to election (30 days primary, 60 days general) (electioneering) Citizens United released "Hillary" 2008 bashing democrats. In 2004 Michael Moore released F911 bashing George Bush
Citizens United v. FEC charges Citizens United was a corporation so Federal Executive Committee ruled against their release of Hillary
Citizens United v. FEC Constitutional issue corporation speech banned? Direct contributions banned?
Citizens United v. FEC Holding BCRA parts that banned corporation speech = unconstitutional. Corporations are made up of people so they are protected under 1 Amendment. Corporations cannot directly contribute to campaigns, limit hard money
Citizens United v. FEC Significance Super PACs companies way around hard money limits. Campaign spending go up.
Created by: elladunmire
 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards