click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
PHIL 1010 Final
Studying for Critical Thinking final
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What makes a poll good? | Random sample, large sample size, unbiased questions, known margin of error. |
| What makes a poll bad? | Self-selected sample, small sample size, leading questions, biased population. |
| When is an argument using poll data strong? | When the poll is methodologically sound and unbiased. |
| When is an argument using poll data weak? | When the poll sample or questions are flawed. |
| When is an argument from authority strong? | When the authority is an expert in the field, unbiased, supported by most experts, and uses reliable evidence. |
| When is an argument from authority weak? | When the authority is biased, outside their field, disagrees with expert consensus, or lacks evidence. |
| What strengthens an argument from analogy? | Many relevant similarities, few relevant differences. |
| What weakens an analogy? | Irrelevant similarities, many significant differences. |
| What is the main rule of causation and correlation? | Correlation does not imply causation. |
| What is a post hoc fallacy? | Assuming A caused B because A happened first. |
| What is a common cause fallacy? | Two events are correlated because of a third cause. |
| Necessary condition? | Something that must be present for an effect to occur. |
| Sufficient condition? | Something that guarantees the effect when present. |
| What is testability? | The explanation can be tested and potentially proven false. |
| What is simplicity? | Explanation with the fewest assumptions. |
| What is scope? | Explanation accounts for the most facts/evidence. |
| What is conservatism? | Fits with well-established beliefs and knowledge. |
| What happens when an explanation is untestable? | It’s a weak explanation. |
| : What makes an explanation simple? | No unnecessary assumptions. |
| What makes an explanation conservative? | Aligns with what we already know about the world. |
| What is good moral reasoning? | Uses evidence, consistent principles, and avoids fallacies. |
| Example of moral inconsistency? | Accepting a rule in one case but rejecting it in similar cases without reason. |
| What are the features of irrational conspiracy theories? | Unfalsifiable, complex, self-sealing, contradict evidence, rely on hidden groups. |
| Why do conspiracy theories fail the criteria of adequacy? | They lack testability, simplicity, conservatism, and scope. |
| What is self-sealing reasoning? | Evidence against the theory is treated as evidence for it. |
| What is the goal of critical thinking in morality? | Evaluate moral claims with clarity, reasons, and consistency. |
| What is utilitarianism’s basic rule? | The morally right action is the one producing the greatest total happiness. |
| How do utilitarians decide what to do? | Compare total consequences for everyone involved. |
| Main problems with utilitarianism? | Can violate rights, too demanding, hard to measure happiness. |
| What is the categorical imperative? | Act only on rules you could universalize; treat people as ends, not means. |
| What makes an action moral in Kantian ethics? | Following a duty-based moral rule regardless of consequences. |
| Problems with Kantian ethics? | Too rigid, ignores outcomes, conflicting duties. |
| How do you tell which explanation is simplest? | Fewest assumptions. |
| How do you tell which explanation has most scope? | Explains the most facts/events. |
| What does it mean if an explanation "lacks conservatism"? | Conflicts with established knowledge. |
| What makes an explanation "not testable"? | No way to prove it false or check evidence. |
| What is the key question when judging an analogy? | Are the similarities relevant to the conclusion? |
| What is the key question when judging a poll? | Is the sample unbiased and representative? |