click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Production
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What does Concavity imply | slope is increasing at a decreasing rate |
| Assumptions of RC | - one agent - produce, consumes coconuts - trade off between labour and leisure (labour is a bad) |
| scenario one - RC as a worker consumer | maximises utility Sub production function f(L) = c Differentiate with respect to l Solve for l and then sub into f(L)=c, to find c = |
| scenario two - RC as a seller-firm | Maximises profit Function f(l) (product of labour) -wL, differentiate with respect to L* and get a function in terms of w - this is Labour demand Sub this function consumption function i.e f(l) - this is consumption supply |
| Cont | max profit is equal to consumption(w) - w.(L*(w)) |
| Scenario three | Solve utiltiy maximisation problem maxC(1-L)(1-L) Where C = WL +profit(w) as found in step 2 |
| cont | differentiate with respect to L and set equal to zero and solve for L in terms of W - this is L** To find W equate L* = L** We should,d then sub into functions of c, l we obtained and show that they are equal |
| First fundamental welfare theorem | any competitive equilibrium of an economy with production is Pareto-efficient |
| is convex its of technology required | no |
| seconf welfare theorem | Given the consumers preferences and the technologies are convex, for any given Pareto optimal allocation there are prices and an allocation of the total endowment and firm ownership shares that males the Pareto optimal allocation implementable by trading |
| cont | and producing in the competitive markets |
| PPF | consists of all efficient points - slope is MRT, emphasing increasing opportunity cost to specialisation |
| comparative Advantage | Lower opportunity cost has a comparative advantage |
| grpahing PPF with 3 consumers | - one with Lower MRT for X will exhaust, then other producer with second lowest MRT will produce, if X is between certain values, and then final producer will produce of X is greater than the exhaustion of producer 2 and less than their production capac |
| smoothing out the PPF | more producers with different opportunity costs |
| list of non convex titles in production | - indivisibilities - workers not on a ful time contract Set up costs Externalities |
| Profit maximisation with PPFs | ALL AGENTS with p1/p2 GREATER than MRT, they should produce good one Agents with p1/p2 LESS than should produce good 2 Thence calculate totals of good 1 and 2 produced |
| profit maximisation of wot goods with smooth convex preferences | set MRT to MRS to determine the amount of ggod 1 and good 2 produced |