click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
thinkingandlearning
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Dual Process Model | A theory suggesting humans use two types of thinking: fast (System 1) and slow (System 2). |
| System 1 thinking | Fast, automatic, intuitive, uses heuristics, low effort. |
| System 2 thinking | Slow, logical, conscious, analytical, high effort. |
| Heuristics | Mental shortcuts used by System 1 for quick decisions. |
| Cognitive bias | Systematic errors in thinking caused by reliance on heuristics. |
| Cognitive misers | The idea that humans avoid using effortful thinking and conserve energy. |
| Cognitive load | When the brain is processing too much and defaults to System 1. |
| Availability heuristic | Judging likelihood based on how easily examples come to mind. |
| Representativeness heuristic | Judging probability based on how much something fits a stereotype. |
| Anchoring bias | Relying too heavily on the first piece of information received (the anchor). |
| Framing effect | Decisions are influenced by how information is presented rather than what is said. |
| Mere exposure effect | Preference for something simply because we are repeatedly exposed to it. |
| Confirmation bias | Tendency to favor information that supports existing beliefs. |
| Anchoring bias study Ly et al. (2023) | Doctors anchored on early info → slower diagnostic decisions. |
| Disfluency study Diemand-Yauman (2011) | Hard-to-read fonts improved recall by triggering System 2. |
| Framing study Keysar (2012) | Framing effect disappears when choices presented in second language. |
| Behaviorism | Theory that behavior is shaped by environment through learning. |
| Operant conditioning | Learning based on rewards and punishments. |
| Positive reinforcement | Adding something good to increase a behavior. |
| Negative reinforcement | Removing something bad to increase a behavior. |
| Positive punishment | Adding something unpleasant to decrease a behavior. |
| Negative punishment | Removing something desirable to decrease a behavior. |
| Shaping | Reinforcing small steps toward a target behavior. |
| Extinction | When behavior decreases because reinforcement stops. |
| Classical conditioning | Learning through association between stimuli. |
| Unconditioned stimulus (US) | Naturally produces response. |
| Unconditioned response (UR) | Automatic response to US. |
| Neutral stimulus (NS) | Stimulus that produces no reaction initially. |
| Conditioned stimulus (CS) | Previously neutral, now triggers response. |
| Conditioned response (CR) | Learned response to conditioned stimulus. |
| Acquisition | The process of learning association between NS and US. |
| Generalization | CR occurs to similar stimuli. |
| Extinction (Classical) | CR disappears when CS repeatedly appears without US. |
| Spontaneous recovery | Return of CR after extinction and rest. |
| Dual Process Model study | Kahneman & Frederick (2002) bat and ball problem. |
| Anchoring study | Tversky & Kahneman (1974) spinning wheel influenced estimates. |
| Availability heuristic study | Tversky & Kahneman (1973) recall influences judgment. |
| Representativeness heuristic study | Tversky & Kahneman (1972) Linda problem. |
| Framing effect study | Tversky & Kahneman (1981) Asian disease scenario. |
| Mere Exposure study | Zajonc (1968) repeated exposure increases liking. |
| Confirmation bias study | Wason (1960) selection task. |
| Disfluency and thinking study | Diemand-Yauman (2011) hard fonts activate system 2. |
| Second language reduces bias study | Keysar (2012). |
| Cognitive Maps study | Tolman (1948) rats learn maze using mental maps. |
| Operant conditioning study | Skinner (1948) pigeon reinforcement. |
| Classical conditioning study | Pavlov (1927) dogs salivate to bell. |
| Scripts study | Bower, Black & Turner (1979) fill in missing story details. |
| Behaviorism evidence | Watson (1920) Little Albert conditioned fear. |