click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Econ 201 chapter 16
Consumer Choice
| Question | Answer | |
|---|---|---|
| A measure of relative levels of satisfaction consumers enjoy from consumption of goods and services | Utility Your satisfaction is quantified with utils. “Utility” = economic way of saying “happiness” ➢Think of a util as a happiness point. ➢You eat a brownie. How many utils (happy points) do you get? | |
| We can state with numbers how much more we prefer one good to another. • Using cardinal numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.) to numerically quantify utility using “utils.” We can state with numbers how much more we prefer one good to another. | Cardinal utility | Example: Imagine you're choosing between three snacks: Chocolate bar: 100 utils, Cookie: 70 utils, and Apple: 30 utils |
| We can rank goods in order of preference, but we can’t say by how much we like one good over another. • Simply being able to only “rank” preferences in the order in which you prefer them (first best, second best, etc.) | Ordinal utility | Example: Using the same snacks: 1st choice: Chocolate bar, 2nd choice: Cookie, and 3rd choice: Apple |
| Faced with two alternatives, A and B, you can tell me whether you prefer A to B, prefer B to A, or you are indifferent between A and B. | Complete preferences | |
| Given a choice between A, B, and C: If you prefer A to B, and prefer B to C, then you must prefer A to C. | Transitive Preferences | |
| The overall amount of happiness from consumption | Total utility | |
| Additional utility gained from consuming one more unit of a good or service | Marginal utility (MU) | |
| If marginal utility is positive, it means that additional consumption will make us happier at the margin, thus increasing our total utility. | Increasing marginal utility | |
| Occurs when marginal utility declines as consumption increases | Diminishing marginal utility | |
| Which would most likely illustrate an example of negative marginal utility? A. studying for another hour B. sleeping in late on a weekend C. eating too much food at an all-you-can-eat buffet D. drinking a second glass of juice with a meal | C. eating too much food at an all-you-can-eat buffet | |
| The limited amount of income available to consumers to spend on goods and services. | Budget constraint | |
| INFORMATION This is a constrained optimization problem: o Goal: To optimize (maximize) utility. o Constraint: Limited budget due to income and prices | ||
| A consumer’s preferences can be represented by indifference curves. • The choices a consumer can make are represented by a budget constraint. • Putting the two together allows us to examine a consumer’s optimum consumption bundle. | ||
| What do you combine to get the consumer's optimum consumption bundle? | Combining the indifference curves and budget constraint | |
| Represent the various combinations of two goods that yield the same level of utility | Indifference curves (IC) | |
| A point at which a certain combination of two goods yields the most utility | Maximization point | |
| INFORMATION Economic “goods”: • Consuming more leads to higher total utility. • Marginal utility is positive. | ||
| INFORMATION Economics “bads”: • Consuming more leads to lower total utility. • Marginal utility is negative. | ||
| You can afford more than before; this is like having a higher income. | income effect | |
| The item has become cheaper relative to the other item | substitution effect | |
| What happens if Price 1 decreases? MU1/P1 > MU2/P2 | Lower prices increase the marginal utility per dollar → So consumers buy more of the good, optimizing utility. Higher prices decrease the marginal utility per dollar → So consumers buy less of the good, optimizing utility | |
| The change in the quantity demanded of a good that results from the effect of a change in price on consumer purchasing power, holding all other factors constant. | Income effect (IE) | |
| The change in the quantity demanded of a good that results from a change in price, making the good more or less expensive relative to other goods, holding constant the effect of the price change on consumer purchasing power. | Substitution effect (SE) | |
| INFORAMTION Change in Income (increase in income) → Shift Budget Constraint | ||
| If I consume more of good Z, what happens? A. The price of good Z will fall. B. The price of good Z will rise. C. My marginal utility of good Z will fall. D. My marginal utility of good Z will rise | C. My marginal utility of good Z will fall. | |
| You get more utility/dollar when you eat burgers than hot dogs. What makes sense? A. Eat more hot dogs since cheaper than burgers B. Get something to drink to go with the food C. Eat more burgers D. Eat at Five Guys since they have better burgers | C. Eat more hamburgers | |
| Suppose that MU1/P1 < MU2/P2 To optimize utility, the consumer should A. buy more X. B. buy less X. C. buy more X and less Y. D. buy more Y and less X. | D. buy more Y and less X. | |
| Price of a good rises, consumers purchase less of that good and purchase more of another good. A. the real-income effect. B. the substitution effect. C. diminishing marginal utility. D. the disadvantage of using “utils” to measure consumption. | B. the substitution effect. | |
| INFORMATION MU1/P1 = MU2/P2 = MU3/P3 =...= MU10/P10 |