click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Stack #4529824
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Amoco Production Company v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe | Narrow definition of natural resources, limited native rights |
| Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc. | Polluters responsible even after pollution stops, gives broad standing |
| United States v. Bestfoods | Corporate veil, parent companies not responsible for what subsidiaries do |
| Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United States | Shell not liable because they didn't intend their products to become contaminants |
| Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill | ESA broadly enforceable, even for projects that started before species was classified |
| Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service | ESA not applicable if species is not already on land |
| Rapanos v. United States | Debated if Waters of the United States included wetlands, split decision |
| Sackett v. EPA | Limited wetlands that were considered WOTUS |
| Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency | EPA has to regulate greenhouse gases |
| West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency | EPA doesn't have powers to limit CO2 emissions, diminished Mass vs EPA |