click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Cooper Chapter 16
Motivating Operations
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Abative Effect | A decrease in the current frequency of a behaviour that has been reinforced by the stimulus that is increased in reinforcing effectiveness by the same MO (i.e. food ingestion decreases frequency of behaviour that has been reinforced by food) |
| Abolishing Operation (AO) | Decreases the reinforcing effectiveness of a stimulus, object, or event, (i.e. reinforcing effectiveness of food is abolished as a result of food ingestion) |
| Behaviour Alternating Effect Conditioned Motivating Operation (CMO) | An alteration in the current frequency of behaviour that has been reinforced by the stimulus that is altered in effectiveness by the same MO (i.e. frequency of behaviour that has been R+ with food increases/ decreases by food deprivation/satiation) |
| Discriminative Stimulus (SD) | * A stimulus in the presence of which responses of some type have been reinforced and in the absence of which the same type of responses have been not been reinforced |
| Establishing Operation (EO) | * A motivation operation that establishes (increases) the effectiveness of a stimulus, object, event as a reinforcer |
| Evocative Effect | An increase in the current frequency of behaviour that has been reinforced by the stimulus that is increased in reinforcing effectiveness by the same MO (i.e. food deprivation = increases frequency of behaviour R+ by food) |
| Function-Alternating Effect | Relatively permanent change in an organisms repertoire of MO, stimulus, response relations, caused by reinforcement, punishment, extinction, or recovery from punishment procedure |
| Motivating Operation (MO) | * An environmental variable that: 1) alters (increases/decreases) the reinforcing or punishing effectiveness of some stimulus, object, event 2) alters (increases/decreases) frequency of all behaviour that has been R or P by that stimulus, object, event |
| Recovery from Punishment Procedure Reflective Conditioned Motivating Operation (CMO- R) | Occurrence of a previously punished type of response without its punishing consequence; undoing the effect of punishment procedure |
| Repertoire- Altering Effect | Contrasted with behaviour-altering effect |
| Reinforcer-Abolishing Effect | A DECREASE in the reinforcing effectiveness of a stimulus, object, or event caused by a MO; i.e food ingestion decreases reinforcing effectiveness of food |
| Reinforcer- Establishing Effect | An INCREASE in the reinforcing effectiveness of a stimulus, object, or event that has been caused by a MO; i.e. food deprivation = increases reinforcing effectiveness of food |
| Surrogate Conditioned Motivating Operation (CMO-S) | A stimulus that acquires its MO effectiveness by being paired with another MO and has the same value-altering + behavior-altering effects as the MO with which it was paired |
| Transitive Conditioned Motivating Operation (CMO- T) | An environmental variable that, as a result of learning history, establishes (or abolishes) reinforcing effectiveness of another stimulus + evokes (or abates) behaviour that has been R by that other stimulus |
| Unconditioned Motivating Operation (UMO) | A MO whose value-altering effect does NOT depend on a learning history; i.e. food deprivation increases reinforcing effectiveness of food w/out learning history |
| Unpairing (2 kinds) | 1. Occurrence alone of a stimulus that has acquired its function by being paired with an already effective stimulus, 2)occurrence of the stimulus in the absence + presence of the effective stimulus |
| Value-Altering Effect |