click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Criminal Law Ch.4
Criminal Law Ch.4 terms
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Mens rea | Latin for guilty mind and is the mental element/criminal intent |
| Culpability/blame-worthiness | The idea that it's fair and just to punish only people we can blame |
| Motive | Something that causes someone to act |
| Subjective fault | Fault that requires a "bad mind" in the actor |
| Objective fault | Requires no purposeful or conscious bad mind in the actor |
| General intent | The intent to commit the criminal act forbidden by statute |
| Specific intent | The general intent to commit the actus reus of a crime plus the intent to cause a criminally harmful result |
| Knowingly | The mental state of awareness in conduct crimes and in result crimes |
| Recklessly | Conscious creation of a substantial or unjustifiable risk of criminal harm |
| Negligently | The mental attitude that a person acts negligently with respect to a material element of an offense when he or she should be aware of an unjustifiable risk |
| Principle of concurrence | Some mental fault has to trigger the criminal act in conduct crimes and the cause in result crimes |
| Causation | Holding an actor criminally accountable for the results of his or her conduct |
| Factual cause | Also called "but for" cause or "cause of fact"; if it weren't for an actor's conduct, the result wouldn't have occurred |
| Legal (proximate cause) | A subjective question that asks, "Is it fair to blame Defendant for the harm triggered by a chain of events his or her action(s) set in motion?" |
| Intervening cause | An event that comes between the initial act in a sequence and the end result |
| Ignorance maxim | The presumption that defendants knew the law they were breaking |
| Mistake of fact | A defense to criminal liability whenever the mistake prevents the formation of any fault-based mental attitude-namely purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently |
| Failure-of-proof defenses | Mistake defenses in which defendants usually present enough evidence to raise a reasonable doubt that the prosecution has proved the mens rea required for criminal liability |