Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Intro to CJ Chap 8
Police and the Rule of Law- Multiple Choice
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| When the Supreme Court hears the cases pertaining to search and seizures, they draw mainly on the ______________ Amendment. | Fourth |
| The Fourth Amendment specifically states the no warrants shall be issued but upon_________________. | probable cause |
| A government actor's infringement on a person's reasonable expectation of privacy is referred to as a _______________. | search |
| Any unoccupied or undeveloped real property outside the grounds attached to a home is referred to as ____________. | curtilage |
| The court decision of California v. Ciraola (1968) established | that the police do not need a search warrant to conduct flyover searches |
| A(n) ___________ occurs when a police officer takes a person into custody or deprives a person of freedom for having allegedly committed a criminal offense. | arrest |
| A police officer cannot arrest someone for a misdemeanor unless the officer sees the crime occur. This is known as | in presence requirement |
| The evidentiary criterion necessary to sustain an arrest or the issuance of an arrest or search warrant is know as | probable cause |
| _____________ is not legal grounds for a search warrant. | a stand alone telephone tip |
| The Court's decision in Illinois v. Gates established this legal standard. | the totality of circumstance test |
| The requirement that a search warrant state precisely where the search is to take place and what items are to be seized is referred to as | particularity requirement |
| The two components of the stop-and-frisk are justified by, respectively: | the need for crime prevention and detection and the need to protect the officer |
| The Chimel doctrine pertains to this type of warrantless search. | searches incident to a lawful arrest |
| What did the court forbid in Delaware v. Prouse regarding police practice during roadblock searches. | random stops of vehicles in the absence of any reasonable suspicion that a law has been violated |
| The situation in which police officers who are suspicious of an individual run their hands lightly over the suspect's outer garments to determine whether the person is carrying a concealed weapon was found constitutional in the court case of | Terry v. Ohio (1968) |
| A pretext stop one in which what happens? | police officers stop a car because they suspect the driver is involved in a crime but lack probable cause |
| In Florida v. Bostick, the court concluded that evidence seized during bus sweeps was admissible in court: | provided that consent was given by the person whose belongings were searched |
| This is true of plain view search and seizure; | it must be based on probable cause |
| This search falls outside of the protection of the plain view doctrine. | the use of thermal imaging devices to search for marijuana in a suspect's house or garage |
| This search falls outside of the plain touch doctrine. | feeling a brick of cocaine in a suitcase during a lawful bus sweep for immigrants |
| The legal grounds that authorize wiretapping of any alien the government believes is a member of a foreign terrorist group or is an agent of foreign power is called | the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act(FISA) |
| This is NOT mandated by Miranda v. Arizona (1966). | the right to face one's accuser |
| Under the Riverside County v. McLaughlin ruling, how long can a person be detained without a court hearing? | 48 hours |
| The ruling that a suspect's age factors into the Miranda custody analysis was established in this court case because children may confess to crimes they did not commit at higher rates than adults. | J.D.B. v. North Carolina |
| This is true of the exclusionary rule | it was applied to federal courts before state courts |
| The exclusionary rule has also been extended to include derivate, or secondary evidence, also called | fruit of the poisonous tree |
| The principle that evidence may be used in a criminal trial even though the search warrant used to obtain it was technically faulty, as long as the police acted without malice when they sought the warrant is called | good faith exception |
| The principle that a suspect can be questioned in the field without a Miranda warning if the information the police seek is needed to protect public safety is called | public safety doctrine |
| This is not a condition necessary for a legal arrest | suspect's consent to an interrogation |
| In addition to probable cause and a neutral and detached magistrate, what is the third key requirement for obtaining a legal search warrant. | particularity |
| This is not a procedural step for serving a warrant | bringing a representative of the media |
| Miranda Rights established | right to remain silent; right to have an attorney present during questioning; stipulation that any statements made can be used in court |
Created by:
Jalessi