Save
Upgrade to remove ads
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

fallacies

fallacies glossary

TermDefinition
anecdotal evidence (logos) using a personal experience or an isolated example as the ONLY support for your argument
begging the question (logos) repeating the claim with different words, trying to pass it off as support for the claim. you basically just described the claim more and using is as support
cardstacking (logos) you subtly leave out inconvenient facts in order to bolster your argument
circular argument (circumlocution) (logos) you restate the argument rather than actually proving it
composition/division (logos) you assumed that one part of something has to be applied to all, or other, parts of it; or that the whole must apply to its partsq
Equivocation/ ambiguity (logos) half-truth; a lie that is given an honest appearance so it will be accepted. often involves a double-meaning. logic is flawed because the audience is not receiving all of the facts. equivocating means to say one thing while seeming to say another.
fallacy fallacy (logos) you presumed that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that the claim itself must be wrong
hasty generalization (logos) a conclusion drawn from insufficient or biased evidence. you are basically rushing to a conclusion before you have all the relevant facts
middle ground (logos) you claimed that a compromise, or mid-point, between two extremes must be the truth
non sequitur ("it does not follow") (logos) you drew a conclusion from something that does not strictly follow from the premise stated
no true scotsman (logos) someone presented compelling evidence against your position. rather than adapting, you shifted the goalposts so that it wouldn't apply to a supposedly "TRUE" example
ignoring the question (logos) you simply avoided answering questions because you had no good response. diversionary tactic
post hoc ergo propter hoc ("after this, therefore, because of this") (logos) you concluded that if "B" occurred after "A", then "A" must have caused "B" (no correlation)
straw man (logos) you oversimplify or misrepresent an opponent's viewpoint in order to attack that argument instead of dealing with the real one
Texas sharpshooter/ faulty causality/ false cause (logos) you assume that a real or perceived relationship between events means that one caused the other (combining clusters of data)
appeal to sentiment (pathos) you appeal to emotions specifically to distract the audience from hard facts which go against your claim or you appeal to the less appropriate emotions of humans ("squirrel")
bandwagon (pathos) you have promoted a course of action simply because the majority of people are doing it
false dichotomy/ false dilemma/ black and white/ either/or (pathos) you oversimplify an argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices. you then paint the preferred choice in the best light possible and/or predict ominous consequences for ignoring your warning.
lesser of two evils (pathos)(situational) unless, of course your moral dilemma forces you to choose between only two available options
loaded question (pathos) you asked a question that had a presumption built into it so that it couldn't be answered without appearing guilty
red herring (pathos) you avoid the issue or some tough question by introducing a distraction (rabbit trail)
scare tactics (pathos) you exaggerate possible dangers well beyond their statistical likelihood, in order to induce people to act in a certain way
scapegoating (pathos) you have blamed a person a group of people for an unfavorable outcome or problem
slippery slope (pathos) (direct tv commercials)
Created by: accident_prone
Popular English Vocabulary sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards