click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
4.4-4.5
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Conversion is | when you switch the subject term with the predicate term. All A are B becomes All B are A |
| Conversion: All A are B | becomes All B are A |
| Conversion: No A are B | No B are A |
| Conversion: Some A are B | Some B are A |
| Conversion: Some A are not B | Some B are not A |
| Conversions that are logically equivalent are: (Hold the same truth value) | E: No A are B and No B are A I: Some A are B and Some B are A |
| Illicit Conversion (Do not hold the same truth value) | A: All A are B and All B are A O: Some A are not B and Some B are not A |
| Obversion | Occurs by changing the quality and replacing the predicate with the term complement. |
| Obversion: All A are B | No A are non-B |
| Obversion: Some A are B | Some A are not non-B |
| Obversion: No A are B | All A are non-B |
| Obversion: Some A are not B | Some A are non-B |
| All obverse statements are | Logically equivalent |
| Contraposition | Switch the subject and the predicate term. And replace the subject and predicate term with their complement. |
| Contraposition: All A are B become | All non-B are non-A |
| Contraposition: No A are B | No non-B are non-A |
| Contraposition: Some A are B | Some non-B are non-A |
| Some A are not B | Some non-B are not non-A |
| Which contraposition statements are logically equivalent | A: All A are B and All non-B are non-A O: Some A are not B and Some non-B are not non-A |
| Illicit contraposition | E: No A are B and No non-B are non-A I: Some A are B and Some non-B are non-A |
| Conversion: | Switch subject and predicate terms. E and I have same truth value. |
| Obversion: | Change quality, replace predicate with complement. A, E, I and O all have same truth value |
| Contrapositive: | Switch subject and predicate terms, then replace with each with their complement. A and O have same truth value |
| Contradictory | relations works the same as they do in the Modern Square of Opposition. |
| Contradictory: if A is true then | O is false |
| Contradictory: If E is true then | I is false |
| Contrary | Under the traditional Square of Opposition, the statements of A and E differ than in the modern model which states they are logically indeterminate |
| Contrary position, which applies to universal statements, | holds that at least one is false (not both true). |
| Contrary: “A” is true then "E" | is false. And if E is true then the corresponding A is false. |
| Contrary: "A" is false, the corresponding E | can be either True or False. |
| Contrary: E is False then the A | can be either True or False. |
| Contrary: 1. All A are B 2. Therefore, no A are B. Assume 1 is true, then 2 is | False |
| Contrary: 1. It is false that No A are B 2. Therefore all A are B assume 1 is false as it states, then 2 is | Indeterminate |
| Subcontrary | applies to particular statements holds that at least one is true (not both false) |
| Subcontrary: If I is false the O | is true |
| Subcontrary: If the O is false then the I | is true |
| Subcontrary: If I is True then O is | either true or false |
| Subcontrary: If O is true then I | is either true or false |
| Subcontrary: 1. It is false that Some A are B 2. Therefore, Some A are not B. If we assume 1 is true, then 2 is | True |
| Subcontrary: Some A are not B Therefore some A are B IF we assume 1 is true as it states, then 2 is | indeterminate |
| Subalternation position applies | the quantity of the propositional statement, truth flows downward and Falsity flows upward. |
| Subalt: if A is True then I | is True |
| Subalt: If I is False then A | is False |
| Subalt: if A is false then the I is | logically indetermined. |
| Subalt: if I is True then A | is logically indetermined. |
| Subalt truth | flows downwards and false flows upwards |
| Subalt: 1.All A are B. 2.Therefore, Some A are B. If we assume 1 is true, then 2 is | True |
| Subalt: 1.Some A are not B. 2.Therefore, no A are B. If we assume 1 is true, then 2 is | Indeterminate |