Help
Options
Didn't know it?
click below
click below
Knew it?
click below
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
retry
shuffle
restart
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Landmark CT CASes
Court Cases
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Marburry v Madison | Judicial Review |
| McCulloch v Maryland | National Supremacy and Implied Powers |
| Gibbons v Ogdon | Broad deffinition of commerce while establishing INTERSTATE COMMERCE |
| Barron v Baltimore | Bill of Right's doesn't apply to STATEs. Gets reduced |
| Plessy v Ferguson | Separate but Equal |
| Weeks v United States | EXCLUSIONARY RULE. FEDERAL illegally obtained evidence must be thrown out. |
| Shnecks v US | Free speech can be limited due to clear and present danger. |
| Weeks v United States | EXCLUSIONARY RULE. FEDERAL illegally obtained evidence must be thrown out. |
| Gitlow v New York | First application of Bill of Rights to states. 1st ammendment used due process of 14th. |
| Shnecks v US | Free speech can be limited due to clear and present danger. |
| Near v Minnesota | Press protected by the first ammendment. Only could charge after the fact of production. |
| Gitlow v New York | First application of Bill of Rights to states. 1st ammendment used due process of 14th. |
| Korematsu v US | upheld Internment Camps |
| Brown v Board 1 | overturned separate but equal (plussy v ferguson. |
| Brown v Board 2 | enforce |
| Brown v Board 1 | overturned separate but equal (plussy v ferguson. |
| Brown v Board 2 | enforce |
| Marburry v Madison | Judicial Review |
| McCulloch v Maryland | National Supremacy and Implied Powers |
| Gibbons v Ogdon | Broad deffinition of commerce while establishing INTERSTATE COMMERCE |
| Barron v Baltimore | Bill of Right's doesn't apply to STATEs. Gets reduced |
| Plessy v Ferguson | Separate but Equal |
| Weeks v United States | EXCLUSIONARY RULE. FEDERAL illegally obtained evidence must be thrown out. |
| Shnecks v US | Free speech can be limited due to clear and present danger. |
| Gitlow v New York | First application of Bill of Rights to states. 1st ammendment used due process of 14th. |
| Near v Minnesota | Press protected by the first ammendment. Only could charge after the fact of production. |
| Korematsu v US | upheld Internment Camps |
| Brown v Board 1 | overturned separate but equal (plussy v ferguson. |
| Brown v Board 2 | enforce brown v board |
| Roth v US | obscenity is not in the realm of public speech |
| Mapp v Ohio | Applies exclusionary rule to states. Illegal evidence must be thrown out. |
| Engel v Vitale | prohibited recitation of State sponsored school prayer |
| Baker v Carr | ONE MAN ONE VOTE. ordered state legislative districts to be as nearly equal as possible to population. |
| Abbingdon v Schempp | prevented bible reading mandatory in school. ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE |
| Gideon v Wainwright | ordered states to provide lawyers to people that cannot afford it. |
| Wesberry v Sanders | ordered CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS TO BE AS EQUAL AS POSSIBLE |
| New York Times v Sullivan | libel must have intent to harm and be wreckless |
| Escovedo v Illinois | Courts cant use evidence that has been obtained before you know your rights or lawyer. |
| Hear of Atlanta Motel v United States | courts upheld a ban on discrimination |
| Griswald v Conn | established the right of privacy through 4th and 9th amendments |
| Miranda v Arizona | Established miranda rights of council and silence |
| Tinker v DesMoines | Freedom of speech extends to symbolic comm |
Created by:
jdm4936