World's most versatile flashcards

or...
Reset Password Sign Up

Fahren Word Scramble

 
 


 

 
Teachers & Webmasters: If you would like this word scramble activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
 

 

 

 
Follow us on Twitter
Be a StudyStack fan on Facebook
www.eapps.com




Copyright ©2001-2009 John Weidner All rights reserved.
About -  Terms of Service -  Privacy Statement



Case Summary
Gibbons v. OgdenThe Supreme Court broadly interpreted the clause in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution giving Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, encompassing virtually every form of commercial activity
Marbury v. MadisonThe case in which Marshall first asserted the right of the Supreme Court to determine
Brown v. Board of EducationSeperate but equal is inherently unequal
McCulloch v. MarylandEstablished the supremacy of the national government over state governments.
Tinker v. Des Moines School DistrictSymbolic speech of students is protected by the First Amendment.
Gitlow v. New YorkOverturned Barron v. Baltimore and incorporated the right to free speech to the states.
New York Times v. SullivanSet guidelines for winning libel suits.
Buckley. v. Valeo"Reasonable restrictions" on campaign contributions are allowed, but limits on
Texas v. JohnsonFlag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Engel v. VitaleNew York cannot mandate a state-composed non-denominational prayer be read in schools beecause it violated the Establishment Clause.
Plessy v. FergusonSeperate but equal facilities for blacks and whites.
Dread Scott V. Sanfordequal protectin of the law
Furman v. GeorgiaCapital Punishment
Korematsu v. United StatesPresidential Powers and Duties & 15; Due Process Clause
United States v. NixonSeparation of Powers, Executive Privilege
Shepard v. Univ. of Wyomingprompted calls for new legislation addressing hate crime, urged particularly by those who believed that Shepard was targeted on the basis of his sexual orientation. Under current United States federal law and Wyoming state law, crimes committed on the bas
Flecther v. Peckfirst case in which the Supreme Court ruled a state law unconstitutional
INS v. Chada United States Supreme Court case ruling that the legislative veto violated the constitutional separation of powers.
Clinton v. NYCStruck down the line-item veto. The line-item veto unconstitutionally gavepresident "the unilateral power to change the text of duly enacted statutes.
Loving v. Virginiaending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.SDefined hotels, restaurants, etc, as interstate commerce because they serveinterstate travellers, and are therefore required to follow federal law oninterstate commerce. The hotel was no longer allowed to discriminate on thebasis of race.
New York Times v. U.SThe government may not restrict the press from publishing what is labeled as"classified information" if the materials will not cause an inevitable, direct, andimmediate event imperiling the safety of American forces.
Brandenburg v. OhioExtended the scope of political speech - allows virtually all political speech,unless it is demonstrably linked to immediate lawless behavior
Webster v. Human Resources
Escabedo v. IllinoisIf the miranda right is not ready to a person or persons being taken intocustody, then due process is violated. In this case a man was not informed ofhis right to remain silent before being questioned by the police and was deniedthe right to counsel.
Westberry v. Sandersdistricts have to be approximately equal in population
Rostker v. GoldbergSelective Service system to adopt a policy of requiring only men to register for the draft
Reynolds v. Simsdistricts for upper houses of state legislatures seats had to be roughly equal in population.
Black v. Virginiacross-burning can be a criminal offense if the intent to intimidate is proven.
Bowers v. Hardwicksodomy law that criminalized oral and anal sex in private between consenting adults
Shaw v. Renoredistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.
Romero v. Evansprevented any city, town or county in the state from taking any legislative, executive, or judicial action to protect homosexual citizens from discrimination on the basis of their sexual orientation.
Martin v. PGA Tour PGA Tour could not lawfully deny him the option to ride in a golf cart between shots
Bradwell v. State of IllinoisMyra Bradwell's efforts to gain admission to the Illinois bar resulted in a Supreme Court decision. Bradwell had married a lawyer and read the law with her husband. In 1869 she passed the Illinois bar examination but was refused admission to the bar. She
Civil Rights cases of 1883The decision held that Congress lacked the constitutional authority under the enforcement provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals and organizations, rather than state and local governments.
City of Ricmond v. J. A Croson Co.the city council of Richmond's minority set-aside program, giving preference to minority business enterprises (MBE) in the awarding of municipal contracts, was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause
Gregg v. GeorgiaDeath penalty does not violate cruel and unusual punishment if administered fairly
Roe v. Wadeabortion rights
Griswold v. Connecticutmarital privacy
Regents of the University of California v. Bakkeaffirmative action in school acceptance
Barron v. Baltimorea precedent on whether the United States Bill of Rights could be applied to state governments
Gideon v. Wainwrightright to be represented in court
Mapp v. Ohiosearch and seizure
Lemon v. Kurtzmanfunding for church related educational institutions
Boy Scouts of America v. DaleThe boy scouts were allowed to dismiss a leader after learning that he wasgay, holding that freedom of association outweighed the New Jersey antidiscrimination statute.
Bush v. Goreconstitutionallity of the recount
Schenck v. USfree speech
Miranda v. Arizonapolice must read off your rights
Reynolds v. United Statesreligion/rights of more then one husband or wife
Baker v. Carrreapportionment