Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

myers psych chap 15

exploring psych myers chap 15 social psychology

QuestionAnswer
Social Psychologist Study how we think about, influence and relate to one another socially
Attribution Theory The tendency to find something to attribute someone's behavior to
Fritz Heider we have a tendency to give a cause or explanation for someone's behavior
Disposition attribution attributing behavior to a person's disposition
Situation attribution attributing behavior to a situation
Fundamental Attribution Error The tendency to attribute more often towards disposition
Attitudes effect ________ and vice versa Actions
Foot in the door Phenomenon tendency for people who first agree with a small request to later comply with a larger one (example help at 6am)
social facilitation refers to improved performance on tasks when in the presence of others
Tripp worked with cyclists - applies only to well learned tasks - must be learned task...anxiety decreases
Social loafing tendency of an individual in a group to exert less effort than when performing individually -somebody else will pick up the slack -decreased responsibility
De-individuation Loss of self awareness - and self restraint in group situation - fosters AROUSAL and ANONYMITY - Mob metality
Group Polarization Enhances a group’s prevailing attitudes through discussion – escalation of belief
Group Think Mode of thinking that occurs when the desire for harmony in a decision making group overrides the realistic appraisal of alternatives
Minority influence the power of one or two individuals to sway majorities – examples Christianity civil rights movement technology advances
Prejudice made up of beliefs (stereotypes), emotional response (hostility, fear, envy), predisposition to act and discriminate
prejudice vs discrimination prejudice is a belief discrimination is the outward out
Role A set of expectations about a social position
Phillip Zimbardo The Stanford Prison Experiement
Cognitive Dissonance Theory People feel discomfort when their actions conflict with their feelings and beliefs
What do we do to relieve cognitive dissonance we justify our actions or modify our beliefs to bring out attitude more in line with our actions
Chameleon Effect Natural tendency to mimic others
Conformity Adjusting ones behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard
Solomon Asch line experiment to show conformity
Things that make conformity stronger in Asch's experiment -one feels incompetent and insecure -group has at least three people -group is unanimous -admire the status or attractiveness -no prior commitment to response -others can observe behavior -cultural influence of social standard
Stanley Milgram Shock experiment showing obedience
Things the make obedience stronger in Milgram's experiment -perceived legitimate authority figure -prestigious institution -distance from victim -no role models for defiance
Overt vs subtle prejudice we are far more subtle about our prejudices
Roots of prejudice Social Emotional Cognitive
Roots of prejudice - social Us VS Them groupings
In group people we relate with or share a common identity
Out group people that we don’t relate to or share a common characteristic
In group bias we are biased towards those in our in group
Roots of prejudice - emotional threat of life and scapegoat theory
Threat of life put people automatically becomes a threatening “them"
Scapegoat Theory having somebody to blame for anger or fear
Roots of prejudice - cognitive Categorization and vivid cases
Categorization putting things into groups becomes an issue when done to a degree that disregards WHY we stereotype and do it without question
Vivid cases example is islam/terrorists
Aggression is any physical or verbal behavior with the intent to hurt or destroy
Aggression - biological factors Genetic influences
Aggression-Genetic influences shown in twins Y chromosome
Aggression-Neurally speaking amygdala
Aggression-Biochemical Influences Hormones neurotransmitters and alcohol
Aggression-Psychological and social cultural factors Averse events – example already in bad mood Models of aggression Social Scripts
Aggression- averse events Fight or flight Aversive stimuli – temperatures etc
Aggression - Observing models of aggression violent family member, child models on playground
Aggression - Social scripts are culturally modeled guides for how to act in various situations
Attraction is based off of Proximity Physical Attraction Commonality/similarity
Two types of romantic love passionate and companionate
passionate love the key is arousal(on the bridge example)
companionate deep steady affectionate attachment
Creating a long term relationship equity self disclosure
Equity a condition in which people receive from a relationship in proportion to what they give
Self-disclosure revealing of intimate details about one’s self
Altruism the unselfish regard for the welfare of others
The bystander effect tendency of any given bystander to be less likely to give aid if other people are present
The social exchange theory our social behavior is an exchange process in which we try to maximize benefits and minimize costs risk to odds
Reciprocity norm expectation that people will help who have helped them
Social responsibility norm expectation that people will help those who are dependent on them
Social traps when the pursuit of self interest leads to collective harm want something and it doesn’t matter the cost
Mirror image perceptions – mutual views often held by conflicting parties when each side sees itself as ethical and peaceful and the other as evil and aggressive
four c's of peacemaking contact cooperation communication conciliation
contact around each other gives opportunity for communication
cooperation brings teams together-overrides competition and conflict Superordinate goals, shared goals that override differences
communication sometimes need a third party mediator
conciliation one side gives on one item…can reciprocate and come back from escalation gradually
roots of prejudice social emotional cognitive
Created by: hkrawietz
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards