click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Fallacies
Philosophy
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Personal Attack | arguer attacks the character of another arguer |
Ad Hominem | arguer irrelevently insults another arguer (literally against the person) |
Lack of Experience | arguer claims opponent does not have enough (or the right kind) of experience to make an argument |
Vested Argument | arguer claims opponent has ulterior motives for making the argument |
Tu Quoque | arguer claims opponent is doing what she/he has been accused of (literally: you also) |
Fallacy | A misstep in an argument, quite literally a device that causes an argument to be useless. It invalidates arguments. |
Mere Assertion | Arguer asserts claim without support, treating a single claim as an argument |
Non-Sequitur | An argument where the conclusion does not follow from the premises |
Dubious Authority | Arguer appeals to the wrong kind of authority |
Unspecified Authority | Arguer appeals to vague authorities such as "scientits" or "studies" without providing specifics |
Appeals to Tradition | Arguer appeals to traditions or length of time something has been in place |
Celebrity | Arguer appeals to celebrities to make his or her case |
Appeal to Novelty | Arguer claims that because something is newer, it must be better |
Appeal to the Masses | Arguer appeals to popularity or "sheer number" |
Appeal to the Few | (Like the appeal to the masses) but with a small, select population |
Appeal to Ignorance | Arguer claims that something is true or false simply because no one has proven otherwise |
Appeal to Force | Arguer threatens a reader or listener |
False Dilemma/False Dichotomy | Posing a false either/or choice when there are more options than what is presented |
Straw Man | Arguer misrepresents an opponent's view |
Slippery Slope | Claiming, without sufficient evidence, that a seemingly harmless action, if taken, will lead to a disasterous outcome |
Equivocation | Arguer uses a key word in two or more different senses |
Circular Reasoning | Arguer assumes the conclusion in one or more premises or reiterates one of more premises in his or her conclusion (same thing said over again) |
Hasty Generalization | Drawing a general conclusion from a sample that is biased or too small |
False Cause | The claim that because one thing occurred after another thing, it must have resulted because of it |
Oversimplified Cause | the claim that because one thing appeared to cause another, it is the only factor in that causation, when in actuality, there is more to the story |
Emotional Appeals | Arguer preys upon the emotions of audience, rather than appealing to reason |
Fear | Arguer tries to scare audience |
Vanity | Arguer "butters up" audience by making them feel good with compliments (similar to the appeal to few) |
Guilt | ARguer attempts to motivate audience by making them feel guilty |
Poisoning the Well | Arguer undercuts the credibility of an opponent so much that the audience will not believe the opponent ever tells the truth |
Red Herring | Arguer tries to distract the attention of the audience by raising an irrevelant issue |