click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
CR Question Type ID
Stem Words That ID Question Types
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Bolded font | R - Describe the Role |
Responds to X by | DA - Describe the Argument |
Assumption | FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" | *Negation* |
Assume | FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" | *Negation* |
Required for the conclusion to be more properly drawn... | FA - Find the Assumption "+" -> "C" | *Negation* |
Evaluate | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Determine | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Useful to know | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Important to know | EV - Evaluate the Argument "+" -> "C" | *2 Paths Answer* |
Challenges X by | DA - Describe the Argument |
Strengthens + If True | ST - Strengthen the Argument Answer Supports Arg. |
Supports + If True | ST - Strengthen the Argument Answer Supports Arg. |
Weakens + If True | WK - Weaken the Argument Answer Weakens Arg. |
Undermines + If True | WK - Weaken the Argument Answer Weakens Arg. |
(Argument + Conclusion/Claim), since ____________. | CA - Complete the Argument Find a "+" to Support Given Claim |
(Argument + Conclusion/Claim), because ____________. | CA - Complete the Argument Find a "+" to Support Given Claim |
Flaw | FL - Flaw "+" -> "C" |
Vulnerable to criticism | FL - Flaw "+" -> "C" |
Explain | ED - Explain the Discrepancy "+" -> __why__ <- "+" |
Resolve | ED - Explain the Discrepancy "+" -> __why__ <- "+" |
If True | ST - Strengthen WK - Weaken |
Conclude | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Infer | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Best supports | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Must be true | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Implies | INF - Inference Arg. Supports Answer |
Which CR Types have NO CONCLUSION in Question? | ED - Explain the Discrepancy INF - Inference |
(Dialogue)+ *something* is illustrated by _____________. | CA - Complete the Argument Need Concrete Ex. of a "+" from the Arg. |
(Dialogue) + *if some claim is true*, it should be expected ______________. | CA - Complete the Argument Inference: Something that MUST BE TRUE given info in the argument |
(Dialogue) + *in order for some claim to be true*, it must be shown ______________. | CA - Complete the Argument Inference: Something that MUST BE TRUE given info in the argument |
Which of the following most logically completes the argument? | ST - Strengthen Answer Supports Arg. |