Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

375 final

QuestionAnswer
Aritotle Philosophy was called eudaminionisn. He believed happiness was the supreme good, and that it was a terminal goal that it can not be reached as the means to another goals end.
Aristotle properties Believed happiness has two properties: independence and stability. independence: can't rely on others for your happiness Stability: you need to be reassured and know that you will be happy
Aristotle Virtue He believed happiness is activity in accordance to virtue, and that virtue is doing well what is worth doing and what you are good at. The human virtue is to think therefore to be happy one must think
Measurement Validity Validity means that you are actually measuring what you think you are measuring, and the the technique used is collecting the writing data
Objectively test for Validity of SWB (most commonly) 1. Informant reports- most common. Researchers ask friends and family of the subject to take the same test as if they were the subject & compare the results. Usually correlates a (.6-.7)
Objectively Test for Validity Physiological factors- they check left/right brain activity as well as heart rate variability. Judge facial features in photo graphs as well
Overestimation of Relationship between Money and Happiness methods Aknin, Norton and Dunn asked people to evaluate the happiness of others based on their incomes, over 10 different income levels. They were also asked to do this for themselves.
Overestimation of Relationship between Money and Happiness Results They rated those w/ low incomes as less happy than they actually are, but were pretty accurate w/ the happiness levels of people with higher incomes.
Overestimation of Relationship between Money and Happiness Implications There's a slight positive relationship between money and happiness, but the relationship tends to be overestimated most of the time. People may strive for more income because they believe it will make them happier
Explanation of money and Happiness 1 There's a relationship between money and happiness but it's not as strong as most people think and the directionality and cause of the relationship is unknown 1. There might be a relationship because happier people make more money
Explanation of money and Happiness 2 The reason the relationship may not be as strong as most people would predict could be contributed to the fact that people with a lot of money to not appreciate mundane pleasures as much as people with less money do
Reason 1 for the paradox of choice 1. paralysis- When people have too many choices there are too many options to choose from and they become overwhelmed and then they are unable to choose at all
Reason 2 for the paradox of choice With the more choices you have you have higher expectations. When your choice doesn't reach that expectation you're not going to be as happy as you could have been. Also a great chance of regret and self blame, you could have picked better
Reason 3 for the paradox of choice Opportunity costs- Even if you are happy with your decision you are still left wondering about the hypothetical "what if" and how things would be if you had made another choice
Parenthood Relationships why: well-being One explanation for the relationship could be anxiety. Lino found that to a raise a child up until 17 years old without including college can average over $200,000. This could explain why SES is a moderator, since those of a higher one wouldn't worry
Parenthood Relationships why: marital satisfaction An explanation could be due to the changes in the workforce now. ... found that parenthood is considered more stressful in the 70s than the 50s. More women are working now, & they need to give up that freedom of work to raise their children (mod.)
Beauty and Well Being Findings Research has found that people who were photographed and judged for PAT in their natural states had higher correlations with SWB (.17) than pictures of them unadorned (.07) They found that gender may be a moderator since males had the highest correlation
Beauty and Well Being Results They inferred that there may be a directionality about this. Since the natural pictures showed a higher correlation, they think that happier people may spend more time on their appearance, therefore they appear to be more physically attractive
Bottom up its the total number of positive/negative life experiences that balance to equal your happiness (nurture)
Top-Down pre-existing happiness is the cause of both pos/negative experiences and positive/negative perceptions of these experiences (nature) *happiness is a combination of both
Genes a Personality Personality on avg. is 50% genetic major traits twin studies for extraversion: Swedish Study: found MZ twins correlated .51, DZ .21 Australian Study MZ: .52 DZ: .17 Twin study for neuroticism, Sweden, MZ: .5 DZ: .23, Australia MZ: .5, DZ.23
Mechanism 1. Affective Forecasting Immune Neglect: When people don't take their coping strategies into account when predicting future events. This leads to errors because people predict that the emotions following an event will last longer and be more intense than they really will be...
Mechanism 2. Affective Forecasting Focalism: When people only focus on how the one event in question will effect future well being, and don't take other everyday activities into account. Error because this singular event isn't the only component of your future happiness
Mechanism 3. Affective Forecasting Inaccurate Lay theories:
Mechanisms of Hedonic Adaptation: Contrst Contrast is when new events compare more or less favorably with an extreme event.
Contrast- Epicurus Epicurus thought that a key part of happiness was having low expectations, this ties in w/ contrast because if you have low expectations, when you compare what you thought would happen with what actually did it should look more favorable
Mechanisms of Hedonic Adaptation: Habituation The general familiarity with the new set of circumstances that erodes the impact of the initial event. If people become familiar with their low expectations, new things will look more favorable
Do Extreme events alter happiness? Method had three groups of participants (winners, victims, control) victims & winners no less than a month no more than a year. They surveyed them on past happiness, present happiness, predicted future happiness, and amount of pleasure taken in mundane things
Do Extreme events alter happiness? Resutlts The winners had higher ratings in all three aspects of happiness compared to the control group, though the differences weren't significant.
Set Point Theory Revision 1. Nonneutral set points: it was first thought that after an emotional event, people returned back to a neutral set point. However, Diener and diener ran a study and found that 3/4 of their participants' affect scores were about neutral most of the time
Set Point Theory Revision 2. Individual Set Points: Diener and Lucas also ran a study and found that set points vary by person due partially to inborn personality based influences
Set Point Theory Revision 3. Multiple set points Expanding upon that lucas, diener and suh found that happiness is made up of separate well being variables, positive emotion, negative, & life satisfaction & that each of these variables has their own set point, instead of one baseline
Why are People Social 1: evolutionary view: social bonds boosted our ancestor's survival rate. Those that were social & joined with others had a better chance of getting what they needed to survive (food, sex, safety) They also had a better chance of reproducing
Why are People Social 2: social brain theory: Dunbar. humans having a bigger brain doesn't aid in their survival, and big brains are biologically expensive. Larger brains dow however allow for more complex social structures
Pain of Social Rejection: Study 1 Dewall gave participants either 500mg of ace. or a placebo 2 times a day for 3 weeks. Each night they took the hurt feelings scale. Found the acetaminophen reduced the self-reported hurt feelings
Pain of Social Rejection: Study 2 They then studied the participants neural mechanisms & the affect ace. has on them. They took 2000mg twice a day for 3 weeks & the did the social exclusion task cyber ball while taking an fMRI. found that it reduced social pain related neural responses
Mechanism of social relationships: what is cortisol cortisol is a steroid hormone produced by the adrenal gland during stressful times in order to increase blood sugar, suppress the immune system, & aid in fat, protein & carbohydrate metabolism
Mechanism of social relationships: evidence Seltzer split kids into 4 groups & measured their hormones using salivary cortisol. He wanted to study different hormone effects on each group. Those who had no contact/IM had much higher levels of cortisol than those who had contact
Self Enhancement 1 (Alicke) better than avg: Ran a study & found that most people tend to contribute good traits as more descriptive of themselves than the avg person, but negative traits as less descriptive of themselves than the average. MOST people can't be better than the avg (
Self Enhancement 2 (Jones and Berglas) Self handicapping: Can be both created, where people purposefully do something to sabotage their success since they fear failure in order to protect their self esteem. Or created, where people just tell others they did in order to look better to them
Self Enhancement 3 (Lewinsohn) self observer residuals: Had observers watch college students work on group tasks. Had both the observers and the students report how they preformed, and the students self ratings were higher than the observer ratings
Depressive Realism what is it Individuals who are low in self esteem, moderately depressed or both are more balanced in self perceptions of good and bad aspects of themselves. Overall pos. & neg. self-relevance are equal
Depressive Realism: studies Brown found that these people display a greater congruence between self evaluations and the evaluations of others. & Lewinsohn found that their self appraisals coincide more closely with appraisals made by objective observers
Created by: roseh2
Popular Psychology sets

 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards